Monetary Discretion, Pricing Complementarity and Dynamic Multiple Equilibria



3.3 Point-in-time equilibria

Solving the monetary authority’s problem under discretion means computing the point-
in-time equilibria that correspond to all possible current policy actions, and then picking
the best action. Before studying this topic in detail in section 4, we here begin by
characterizing point-in-time equilibria for an arbitrary policy action in the current period.
Point-in-time equilibrium refers to the values of p
0,t that solve (18) for given current
and future monetary actions, and a given future price p
0,t+1.The mechanisms described
earlier lead to the potential for multiple point-in-time equilibria. We assume that the
future money supply is given by
mt+ι (m*,fn), (i.e. steady-state equilibria do exist
for the assumed value of m
t+1 and are inflationary) and that the future relative price
is consistent with one of the two steady-state equilibria that may prevail if that level of
m
t+1 is maintained forever. Under these assumptions, there are either two equilibria in
the current period or equilibrium does not exist. Again, in a knife edge case equilibrium
is unique.

Proposition 2 If mt+1 (m*,m) is fixed, then there exists m such that for mt < m
there are two equilibria in period t, and for m
t > m equilibrium does not exist in period t.

Proof. see appendix for a sketch. ■

Point-in-time equilibria are fixed points of the best-response function for current pe-
riod price-setters, which we write without time subscripts, using superscript prime to
denote next period:

P0 = r (po,m,p0,m9 = m* £(1 - θ (po∙∕'0)) m + θ (po,p0) m0po]

(23)


No expectation operator appears because we are assuming, for the purposes of this sec-
tion, that there is no uncertainty about future m and — more importantly — future p
0 .
Multiplicity of point-in-time equilibria occurs for much the same reason as multiplicity
of steady states. Because the future
nominal money supply is endogenous, the current
price of other firms has an effect of more than one-for-one on a single firm’s desired price
if agents weight the future heavily, as they do if m
0 > m* and po is high enough. Note
that as long as the
future money supply is inflationary, there will be multiple equilibria
even for noninflationary current values of the money supply.

Figure 2 illustrates the multiplicity of point-in-time equilibria for m = m0 >m* ,
for two different beliefs about future p
0 . As above, the dashed line is the 450 line that
identifies fixed points: the two points marked with asterisks (‘*’) on the
45o line are

18



More intriguing information

1. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
2. The Complexity Era in Economics
3. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models
4. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
5. An Attempt to 2
6. The name is absent
7. The Functions of Postpartum Depression
8. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
9. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
10. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
11. The name is absent
12. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
13. Two-Part Tax Controls for Forest Density and Rotation Time
14. The name is absent
15. Private tutoring at transition points in the English education system: its nature, extent and purpose
16. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
17. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
18. The name is absent
19. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
20. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine