effects of the reforms, as the lifetime earnings distributions do not represent forecasts
of future earnings of graduates. Rather, they are based on current earnings data.
Estimating the distribution of earnings of future graduates poses more severe
challenges, particularly as this distribution is likely to itself be affected by the
reforms. This is for a number of reasons. First, the reforms may affect the decision to
participate in HE, which may alter the composition of students/graduates and thus
earnings. Second, the reforms may have general equilibrium effects, through affecting
the supply of graduates for example, which may alter the relative wages of future
graduates. Third, the reforms may affect choices at university, such as courses studied
and the length of time spent at university, both of which may affect lifetime earnings.
We leave these important topics for future work to address.
Institute for Fiscal Studies and Institute of Education, University of London
Institute for Fiscal Studies
Institute for Fiscal Studies
New York University and Institute for Fiscal Studies
32
More intriguing information
1. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design2. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance
3. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
7. WP RR 17 - Industrial relations in the transport sector in the Netherlands
8. An Incentive System for Salmonella Control in the Pork Supply Chain
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent