Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs



in place at least until 2010.5 In addition, there are no longer any exemptions for fees
based on family income (see Table 1). Instead of being payable up front, all fees are
now deferrable until after graduation, with loans available at a zero real interest rate,
repayable according to income (at 9% above a threshold of £15,000). New grants are
available for many students (up to £2,700 for the poorest students, tapered to zero at
parental income of £60,000) and bursaries are now received by the poorest students
(at least £300 for the full fee). Further details are set out in Dearden et al (2005,
2007).

Table . An outline of the old system and new HE funding system for England

The “old” system                         The “new” system

Students would pay £1,200 in 2006-07a      From 2006-07 students pay £3,000

- Up-front fee                               - Deferred fee

(subsidised loans: zero real
interest, 25 yr debt write-off)

- Flat fee rate                                   - Variable fee rate

- Exemptions based on family        - No exemptions

income

- Pre 2004-05, no grant                      - Up to £2,700 in grants, plus

additional bursaries

a In 2005-06 the fee is £1,175, and in the absence of reform this is up-rated in line with inflation each year.

For more detail, see Dearden et. al. (2005).

Sources: Department for Education and Skills, The Future of Higher Education, Cm. 5735, 2003; The Higher
Education Bill
, Bill 35, 2004; The Future of Higher Education and the Higher Education Act 2004: Regulatory
Impact Assessment
, 2004; Moving toward a Single Combined Grant for Higher Education, 2004; DIUS Press
Release
Increased Support for Students in Higher Education, 2007.

3. Distributional effects of the reforms: by parental income

Much concern has been expressed about the equity, or distributional consequences of
the new fee regime. In this section we consider the distributional consequences in one
particular dimension, namely how individuals are affected according to their parents’
income. By looking at how payments balance out across the lifetime, we show that
relatively less well off students are more than compensated for the increases in fees by
large additions to up-front support in the form of maintenance grants and subsidies.
For students from richer backgrounds, the total additional costs of entering university

5 The system against which changes are measured, is the system in place in 2003-04, which was the
final year before any of the new reforms, first set out in the 2003 White Paper, had begun to be
implemented. Note also that all figures throughout the paper are expressed in 2006 prices.



More intriguing information

1. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
6. The name is absent
7. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
8. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
9. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
10. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
11. Clinical Teaching and OSCE in Pediatrics
12. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
13. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
14. The name is absent
15. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
16. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
17. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
18. Giant intra-abdominal hydatid cysts with multivisceral locations
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent