The name is absent



Flexibility and security: an asymmetrical relationship?

tion, extensive use of precarious workers or outsourcing, result into a lower investment of the com-
pany in human capital and, hence, in lower productivity. Workers that are under-paid have reduced
motivation and attachment to their workplace. Increased labour mobility also weakens loyalty to the
company/organization. By contrast, job stability, access to training, job enrichment, career opportu-
nities and work-life balance improve the commitment of the workforce and its performance, to the
benefit of the employer.

Diagram 3: Implications of various forms of flexibility for companies and workers

form of flexibility

implications for companies

implications for workers

temporary (fixed-term)
employment contracts

higher quality matches,
higher efficiency

lower incentive to invest in
human capital, decreasing
productivity

opportunity to assess the
potential of new recruits
without risking dismissal
costs

job instability leading to job
insecurity

shorter duration of
unemployment

“port of entry” or trap to
precarious employment?

vulnerability to new social
risks

few (if any) training
opportunities, as well as
employment and SS rights

low job satisfaction

lower work attachment

less combination security

involuntary part-time work

voluntary part-time work

•   higher numerical flexibility

•  more committed employees

as above

possibility to combine work
and family responsibilities

low EPL-index

easy firing & hiring
procedures to adjust the
number of workers to
demand fluctuations

disincentive to invest in
innovation and functional
flexibility, as a response to
competitive pressures

job insecurity

income instability

uncertainty for the future

working time flexibility
determined by employers
(company oriented)

better response to
fluctuations of demand

better use of equipment and
human capital

•   difficulties in achieving a

work-life balance

possibility to adjust start and
finishing times

individualized working time
arrangements (employee
oriented)

•   mutual benefits for

companies and workers

greater working time
autonomy

possibility to accumulate
hours for shorter or longer
periods of leave

functional flexibility

improved performance of
the workforce

access to training,
continuous updating of skills

increased employability

job satisfaction

wage flexibility

rationalization of wage costs

increased income for some,
decreased earnings for others

Page 19



More intriguing information

1. Handling the measurement error problem by means of panel data: Moment methods applied on firm data
2. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
3. The name is absent
4. A MARKOVIAN APPROXIMATED SOLUTION TO A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
5. A Classical Probabilistic Computer Model of Consciousness
6. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
7. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
8. The name is absent
9. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
10. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge