2 Job Creation across Vertically Integrated Sectors
over Time and across Countries
We now apply this approach to the six economies (US, UK, Germany, France, the Netherlands,
Spain) for the period from the late 1970s to the late 1990s. The main data that we use are the
standardised (domestic) input-output tables prepared by the OECD. To allow for the differing
incidence of part-time work across the six economies employment is measured as far as
possible on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis. More detail on the data is given in Appendix 1.
The implication of the conventional view of services as characterized by high employment-
intensity (low labour productivity) is that they create more employment per unit of final demand
than manufacturing industries where labour productivity is higher. By focusing exclusively on
within-sector employment this view neglects the fact that high productivity manufacturing
industries are also involved in the production of services through supplying necessary
intermediate goods, and vice-versa with service inputs into manufactures. The VIS approach
encapsulates these inter-relations; employment is generated in intermediate as well as final
production, and labour productivity depends on efficiency in labour use throughout the supply
chain as well as in the final sector.
For each country we first present the VIS measure of the employment-intensity of all the
individual sectors. This is calculated as the employment generated economy-wide by the
injection of a standardized increment of final demand to the sector. The demand injection is
made to the single industry, notionally holding final demands for all other industries at zero, to
give employment created in that VIS sector. We repeat this for each sector in turn. The
injection is standardized at 1 million units in the country’s own currency, converted to prices of
the most recent year. VIS employment then allows us to compare the number of jobs generated
economy-wide by the injection to each industry. (Since on the input-output methodology each
unit of final demand requires the same use of inputs we can think of this interchangeably as a
unit of consumption, investment, government expenditure or export demand for the product.)
More intriguing information
1. Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: What One Should Know Before Running a Test2. Evaluating the Impact of Health Programmes
3. The name is absent
4. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
5. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
6. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
7. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
8. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
9. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
10. The name is absent