THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY



2. Producer Decisions and Welfare

Before examining the innovation and pricing decisions in the pure and mixed oligopsonies, we need to
analyze the way farmers make their selling decisions at the pre- and post-innovation stages. By doing so,
we can derive the supplies faced by each firm and obtain measurements of producer (farmer) welfare
before and after the cost-reducing process innovation activity.

In both the pre- and post-innovation stages of the game, farmers have to decide whether to sell
their product to Firm I or Firm C. Due to differences in their location, commitment to the two firms
(Fulton and Giannakas, 2001), and/or the prices offered by the two firms, their net returns depend on the
firm they will deliver their product to. Let
α [0,1] be the attribute that differentiates agricultural
producers. The farmer with attribute
α has the following net returns function at the pre- and post-
innovation stages of the game:

(1) ΠIf(k)=wI(k)-cf-tα            If a unit of product is sold to Firm I

ΠCf(k)=wC(k)-cf-t(1-α)      If a unit of product is sold to Firm C

where k denotes the stage of the game; ΠIf(k) and ΠCf (k) are the per unit net returns when the farm output is
delivered to Firm I and Firm C, respectively;
wI(k) and wC(k) are the per unit prices paid by Firm I and Firm
C, respectively; and
c f is the farmers’ cost of producing the agricultural product. The parameter t is non-
negative and captures the degree of producer heterogeneity (when producers differ in their physical location,
t denotes the transportation cost they face). Ceteris paribus, producers with large values of α prefer to sell
their product to Firm C, while producers with low values of
α prefer selling to Firm I. The greater is t , the
greater the difference in the net returns associated with selling the farm product to the two firms.

To ensure positive market shares for the two firms, it is assumed that t exceeds the difference in
the prices of the two firms (see equations (3) and (4)), while, to retain tractability, the analysis assumes
that producers are uniformly distributed between the polar values of
α. Each farmer produces a unit of the
agricultural product and their selling decision is determined by the relationship between
ΠIf(k) and ΠCf (k).



More intriguing information

1. A model-free approach to delta hedging
2. EFFICIENCY LOSS AND TRADABLE PERMITS
3. From music student to professional: the process of transition
4. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
5. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
6. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS
7. Brauchen wir ein Konjunkturprogramm?: Kommentar
8. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
9. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkul des naturlichen Schlieβens nebst Metatheorie
10. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
11. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
12. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
13. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
14. Detecting Multiple Breaks in Financial Market Volatility Dynamics
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
18. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY
19. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
20. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry