An Incentive System for Salmonella Control in the Pork Supply Chain



testing costs not paid for by the producers. The plant also receives penalties assessed to producers.
Otherwise, the plant’s processing margin per hog is fixed.

The manager chooses a compensation/testing system, α, and plant level control package, γt, that
optimizes her relevant performance measure, subject to producers’ optimal behavior under the
incentive system and the participation constraint that the certainty equivalent of each producer’s
expected net gain from participation in the
Salmonella control program must be greater than or equal to
zero. The manager’s relevant performance measure depends on the ownership structure for the
slaughter plant. We consider two structures: ownership by non-producer investors (IOF) and
ownership by a producer cooperative (COOP).

Under the IOF structure, the manager maximizes the plant’s expected gain from participation in
a
Salmonella control program, which is defined as the expected premium received from downstream
customers plus expected penalties paid to the plant by producers minus plant control costs, producer
quality premiums and S
almonella testing costs paid by the plant. Under the COOP structure, the
manager maximizes the certainty equivalent of the representative producer’s net gain from
participation in the
Salmonella control program subject to the constraint that the plant’s expected gain
from participation in the
Salmonella control program is greater than or equal to zero.

We also consider the case where the manager chooses incentive system parameters to maximize
net gains from
Salmonella control for the entire two segment chain (CHAIN). In this case, which
serves as an overall efficiency benchmark for chain operations with decentralized decision making, the
objective is to maximize the plant’s expected quality premium minus control and testing costs.
Penalties paid by producers to the slaughter plant are not considered explicitly in the function to be
maximized, since they are simply within-chain transfers between parties. Because these penalties are
stochastic and producers are risk averse, however, the incidence of penalties does indirectly affect

12



More intriguing information

1. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
2. The name is absent
3. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
4. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds
5. The name is absent
6. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
7. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
8. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
9. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
10. Les freins culturels à l'adoption des IFRS en Europe : une analyse du cas français
11. The name is absent
12. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China
13. Protocol for Past BP: a randomised controlled trial of different blood pressure targets for people with a history of stroke of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in primary care
14. Rural-Urban Economic Disparities among China’s Elderly
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. Public infrastructure capital, scale economies and returns to variety
18. The name is absent
19. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen
20. Assessing Economic Complexity with Input-Output Based Measures