An Incentive System for Salmonella Control in the Pork Supply Chain



depends on the ownership structure for the slaughter plant, and all the revenues and costs for the
producer and the slaughter plant are readily calculated using the output from the producer model.

6      Results

Nash equilibrium incentive system parameters and key performance measures for
bacteriological threshold values
BPREV* {0.5, 1.0, 1.5, ..., 3.5} under each of the three ownership
structures are presented in table 4. All expected performance measures are calculated using the
producer’s optimal S
almonella control policies, the plant’s optimal Salmonella control policy and the
associated steady state probabilities for each possible production history state. The dynamic
programming solution identifies an optimal control package for each production history level and a
steady state probability that a producer will be in each of the
α1+ 1 possible production history states.
Multiplying the costs of the optimal control package for each state by the associated steady state
probability and summing over all
α1 + 1 states yields the expected farm control cost.

Changes in the bacteriological prevalence threshold level lead to changes in control actions,
incentive parameter values, and performance results. The producer always pays for testing costs under
IOF and CHAIN ownership, and the slaughter plant pays for testing costs under COOP ownership.
Farmer cost are high and farmer certainty equivalent of gain is low under IOF ownership. The pattern
is reversed under COOP ownership, and intermediate values are taken under CHAIN ownership.

The use of farm and plant control packages changes with varying bacteriological threshold
levels, but is very similar across ownership structures. For bacteriological threshold values of 3.5% and
3.0% , the optimal producer policy always calls for control package 1.  Lowering the bacteriological

plant threshold from 3.5% or 3.0% to 2.5% induces more producers to use control package 2 with strict
all-in/all-out procedures under all three ownership structures. Farm control package 2 is applied by all

17



More intriguing information

1. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
2. Imitation in location choice
3. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
4. The name is absent
5. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
6. The name is absent
7. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
8. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives
9. A Hybrid Neural Network and Virtual Reality System for Spatial Language Processing
10. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
11. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
12. Moi individuel et moi cosmique Dans la pensee de Romain Rolland
13. Update to a program for saving a model fit as a dataset
14. Implementation of a 3GPP LTE Turbo Decoder Accelerator on GPU
15. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
16. Determinants of U.S. Textile and Apparel Import Trade
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
20. DURABLE CONSUMPTION AS A STATUS GOOD: A STUDY OF NEOCLASSICAL CASES