Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints and Off-Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain for Green Program on Rural Households in China



The 2003 household survey used a stratified sampling strategy designed to collect data on a
random sample of 359 households in the program area. From the three provinces (Sichuan, Shaanxi and
Gansu) that had been participating in
Grain for Green since 2000, we selected two counties from each
province and then randomly selected three townships from each county. In each township, we randomly
selected two participating villages and randomly chose ten households from each village. The data
includes information on at least one program-participating household for each village. Two of the 36
villages had only participating households. The survey in 2003 collected information on 2002 and 1999.
The survey in 2005 was nearly identical to the earlier wave and included 348 households. Of the 359
households surveyed in 2003, we were able to track 270 of them in 2005, 230 of which were
participating households. Of the 230 households, 27 had entered the program since 2003. The attrition
rate (from the survey) was 24 percent for households participating in the program and 32 percent for
nonparticipating households. The households not included in the 2005 survey were not systematically
different from households that were included in both surveys and were dropped from further analysis.10

Among the program participants, there is variability in the number of years that they
participated; the extent of their participation (in terms of absolute cultivated area and share of the
household’s cultivated area) varied widely across the sample (Figures 1 and 2). A third of the households
in the sample started to participate during the initial year of the program (Figure 1). The share of land
that each household retired from cultivation also varied among participating households and ranged
from less than 5 percent of total cultivated land holdings to 100 percent (Figure 2). When considering
program impacts, it is reasonable to expect that the effect of the program will vary depending on how



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
3. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
4. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
5. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
6. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
7. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
8. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
9. The name is absent
10. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
11. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
12. Draft of paper published in:
13. The name is absent
14. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
15. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN TENNESSEE ON WATER USE AND CONTROL - AGRICULTURAL PHASES
16. Fiscal federalism and Fiscal Autonomy: Lessons for the UK from other Industrialised Countries
17. Menarchial Age of Secondary School Girls in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
18. EU enlargement and environmental policy
19. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
20. The name is absent