The name is absent



Appendix B: Details of studies included in the review (not screening tools)

Item

Country

Study design

Population features

Features of intervention

Mode, provider and setting

Type of
evidence

Ozer et al.
(2001)

USA

Single group
pre-test/post-
test study

Age

Young people
13-17 year- olds

Gender

Mixed sex

What is being assessed?
Unspecified health check,
including behavioural measures

What is offered to the young
person following the health
assessment?

Tailored advice

What is the mode of the assessment?

Screening tool

Consultation / interview

Who provides the intervention?

Clinicians

Intervention site

Specialist clinic

Effectiveness

Ozer et al.
(2004)

USA

Survey

Outcome
evaluation -
design not
stated

Age

Young people

Gender

Mixed sex

What is being assessed?
Unspecified health check,
including behavioural measures

What is offered to the young
person following the health
assessment?

Tailored advice

What is the mode of the assessment?

Screening tool

Consultation / interview

Who provides the intervention?

Health professional - unspecified

Effectiveness

Ozer et al.
(2005)

USA

Trial

Process
evaluation

Age

Young people

Adults

Gender

Mixed sex

What is being assessed?
Unspecified health check,
including behavioural measures

What is offered to the young
person following the health
assessment?

Tailored advice

What is the mode of the assessment?

Screening tool

Consultation / interview

Who provides the intervention?

Health professional - unspecified

Intervention site

Specialist clinic

Effectiveness

A scoping review of the evidence relevant to life checks for young people aged 9 to 14 years

57




More intriguing information

1. PER UNIT COSTS TO OWN AND OPERATE FARM MACHINERY
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
5. The name is absent
6. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
7. The name is absent
8. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
9. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
10. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D