Appendix B: Details of studies included in the review (not screening tools)
Item |
Country |
Study design |
Population features |
Features of intervention |
Mode, provider and setting |
Type of |
Ozer et al. |
USA |
Single group |
Age Young people Gender Mixed sex |
What is being assessed? What is offered to the young Tailored advice |
What is the mode of the assessment? Screening tool Consultation / interview Who provides the intervention? Clinicians Intervention site Specialist clinic |
Effectiveness |
Ozer et al. |
USA |
Survey Outcome |
Age Young people Gender Mixed sex |
What is being assessed? What is offered to the young Tailored advice |
What is the mode of the assessment? Screening tool Consultation / interview Who provides the intervention? Health professional - unspecified |
Effectiveness |
Ozer et al. |
USA |
Trial Process |
Age Young people Adults Gender Mixed sex |
What is being assessed? What is offered to the young Tailored advice |
What is the mode of the assessment? Screening tool Consultation / interview Who provides the intervention? Health professional - unspecified Intervention site Specialist clinic |
Effectiveness |
A scoping review of the evidence relevant to life checks for young people aged 9 to 14 years
57
More intriguing information
1. PER UNIT COSTS TO OWN AND OPERATE FARM MACHINERY2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
5. The name is absent
6. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
7. The name is absent
8. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
9. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
10. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D