Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment



projected revenues at $65 (with adjustments for awareness and internal hypothetical bias) to the
benchmark revenues ($30 million and $1 million for the RDD and NPF populations).

Panel B of Table 9 shows the total degree of awareness and hypothetical bias using the RDD sample
and the non-parametric forecasts implies that NRP revenues are approximately 16 times higher than the
unadjusted data suggest. The total bias using the NPF sample is much lower and even slightly negative in
the non-parametric case. This suggests the overall hypothetical bias for the general public RDD sample is
greater than the bias for the more pass-experienced NPF sample. The result also confirms previous
empirical and meta-analysis research that market experience helps mitigate valuation biases (e.g., List and
Shogren, 1998; Cherry et al., 2003; Cherry and Shogren, 2007; List and Gallet, 2001; Murphy et al.,
2005).

6.2 Projected Revenue Functions

In Table 8, we present non-parametric, calibrated estimates for NRP and gate revenues from the RDD
and NPF samples.

6.2.1 NRP Revenue

As shown in Table 8, the NRP revenue functions reach maximums at approximately $25 and $45 for
the RDD and NPF samples.11 For the RDD sample, NRP revenues drop sharply at $45 and then level off
up to $105, after which pass revenues again begin to fall more rapidly. In the NPF sample, the decline in
pass revenues after the peak is steady out to $275. The degree of sensitivity of NRP revenues to price
reflects the elasticity of the underlying demand curve for the NRP. Recall, all these revenue functions are
calibrated for awareness, hypothetical and external bias as described in Section 6.1.

6.2.2 Gate Revenue

11 We calculate the non-parametric revenue functions by assuming the household’s true WTP is at the midpoint of
the chosen bid interval. Households that answer “YES” to both bids are assigned a WTP equal to $10 plus the high
bid. Households that answer “NO” to both bids, but “YES” when asked if they would accept the new pass for free,
are assigned a WTP equal to half the lower bid. Those that reject both bids, and also say they would not accept the

19



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
3. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation
4. The name is absent
5. Happiness in Eastern Europe
6. On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions
7. The name is absent
8. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
9. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
10. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
11. How to do things without words: Infants, utterance-activity and distributed cognition.
12. Financial Development and Sectoral Output Growth in 19th Century Germany
13. The name is absent
14. Who is missing from higher education?
15. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
16. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE
17. Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?
18. On Evolution of God-Seeking Mind
19. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
20. The name is absent