Spatial Aggregation and Weather Risk Management



Table 2a. Hedging Results of Historical Simulation, In-Sample Estimates, Full Sample, 1971-2002

District

Average of

Districts

State

(Aggregated)

D10

D20

D30

D40

D50

D60

D70

D80

D90

Unhedged

Avg. Yield

152.09

147.44

151.81

158.60

144.36

157.66

139.80

123.89

126.29

144.66

144.66

RMSL

43.07

42.06

48.90

50.42

52.97

42.89

43.07

41.07

44.34

45.42

39.80

ES 6%

240.56

237.91

224.41

235.23

201.04

251.92

227.55

192.83

181.88

221.48

235.38

ES 9%________________

258.39

246.09

235.74

252.45

216.20

277.84

241.14

195.22

196.93

235.55

________255.18

Hedged: Swap_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Weight

(contracts/acre, $1 tick)

0.17

0.19

0.26

0.31

0.33

0.28

0.27

0.15

0.30

0.25

0.27

Swap Fair Strike

644.26

803.91

798.75

851.04

804.03

907.38

1000.38

1092.37

994.53

877.40

877.40

RMSL

36.62

35.78

39.71

35.94

33.94

28.33

34.25

36.36

29.35

34.47

27.11

Change RMSL

-6.45

-6.29

-9.19

-14.48

-19.04

-14.56

-8.82

-4.70

-14.99

-10.95

-12.69

% Change RMSL

-14.97

-14.95

-18.80

-28.72

-35.94

-33.95

-20.48

-11.45

-33.80

-23.67

-31.88

ES 6%

268.96

265.89

253.94

276.25

263.69

318.32

243.14

216.71

230.44

259.71

281.75

ES 9%

281.75

268.19

273.14

292.36

270.04

326.55

258.27

222.80

234.68

269.75

284.68

Change ES 6%

28.41

27.98

29.53

41.03

62.65

66.40

15.58

23.88

48.57

38.23

46.37

Change ES 9%__________

23.36

22.10

37.40

39.91

53.85

48.72

17.13

27.59

37.75

________34.20

_________29.49

Hedged: Call Option

WEIGHT (contracts/Acre,
$1 tick)

2.44

0.69

0.59

0.73

0.56

0.39

0.69

0.18

0.54

0.76

0.68

Optimal Call Strike

864.96

875.89

876.00

920.78

819.00

929.68

1056.00

943.00

1014.00

922.15

953.48

RMSL

28.15

34.54

37.08

32.74

32.00

30.05

32.94

35.40

25.82

32.08

22.56

Change RMSL

-14.91

-7.53

-11.82

-17.68

-20.98

-12.84

-10.13

-5.67

-18.52

-13.34

-17.23

% Change RMSL

-34.63

-17.90

-24.17

-35.06

-39.59

-29.93

-23.51

-13.81

-41.76

-28.93

-43.31

ES 6%

296.46

254.24

265.16

290.69

263.34

314.05

257.82

221.10

249.64

268.06

295.29

ES 9%

304.80

273.51

274.00

306.76

271.39

319.75

264.94

227.23

253.43

277.31

302.31

Change ES 6%

55.90

16.33

40.75

55.46

62.30

62.13

30.26

28.28

67.76

46.57

59.91

Change ES 9%

46.41

27.42

38.26

54.31

55.19

41.91

23.80

32.01

56.51

41.76

47.13

aThe table presents results of the hedging analysis under the assumed objective of minimization of SV with an assumed constant price of
$2.50/bu. In-sample estimates were obtained by optimizing the objective with respect to the WD weight (WD weight and optimal strike)
when hedging with swaps (options). Statistics measuring changes in RMSL and ES are calculated relative to the unhedged revenue
exposures. “Average of Districts” column statistic values were obtained by averaging the individual district statistic values and is provided
to serve as a basis of comparison to the “State (Aggregated)” results. A decrease (increase) in the RMSL corresponds to a reduction
(increase) in risk as a result of the addition of a WD. In contrast, an increase (decrease) in the ES indicates a reduction (increase) in risk
exposure from adding a WD.

31



More intriguing information

1. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
2. Visual Perception of Humanoid Movement
3. THE RISE OF RURAL-TO-RURAL LABOR MARKETS IN CHINA
4. The name is absent
5. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
6. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers
7. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
8. Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care
9. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
10. How we might be able to understand the brain
11. The name is absent
12. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
13. What should educational research do, and how should it do it? A response to “Will a clinical approach make educational research more relevant to practice” by Jacquelien Bulterman-Bos
14. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
15. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
16. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis
17. Picture recognition in animals and humans
18. Segmentación en la era de la globalización: ¿Cómo encontrar un segmento nuevo de mercado?
19. The name is absent
20. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region