
Figure 2: Reaction curves are constant except for a jump down, which precludes
symmetric equilibrium.
The number of equilibria may be obtained by finding the explicit form of
the reaction curves.
1 ify ≤ 1/2 1 ifx ≤ 1/2
r1 (y)= r2 (x)=
(13)
I 1/2 if y> 1/2 I 1/2 if x> 1/2
Figure 2 illustrates that there exists exactly one pair of pure strategy Nash
equilibria, namely (1, 2 ) and ( 2, 1) .
We can compare equilibria from the point of view of player 1, using the dual
to the Theorem 3.3. The payoff function of player 1 when x ≤ y, is constant
along his best reply, i.e. L2(r1 (y) ,y)=0. Therefore we conclude that player 1
prefers the equilibrium where he is more active.
4 Endogenous heterogeneity without monotonic
best replies
In the previous section we discussed symmetry breaking via strategic substitutes
and nonconcavity of the payoff function. In this section we extend the analy-
sis from the previous section to encompass other forms of strategic interaction.
18
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
3. The name is absent
4. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
5. The name is absent
6. On the Real Exchange Rate Effects of Higher Electricity Prices in South Africa
7. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN FARMERS IN AFRICA: LESSONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; WITH AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
8. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
9. Implementation of the Ordinal Shapley Value for a three-agent economy
10. The name is absent