the original height of the square and its length is not bigger than α, as defined in
Lemma 8.1. We will now show that for points in the vertices of such rectangles
the thesis holds and a fortiori it is possible to obtain the conclusion for the
whole square. Figure 6 illustrates the proof.
Let x - z = kα, where k ∈ R,andα>0 is small enough. Now consider the
rectangle defined by the following points (x, x), (x, x - α), (z, x) and (z, x - α) .
From Lemma 8.1 we know that
F(x, x - α) - F(x - α, x - α) ≥ F(x, x) - F(x - α, x)
Also, from A1 we know that
F(x - α, x - α) - F(z, x - α) ≥ F(x - α, x) - F (z, x)
Adding these two inequalities we obtain that
F(x, x - α) - F(z, x - α) ≥ F(x, x) - F (z, x) (24)
Repeating the procedure, consider the rectangle defined by: (x, x - α), (x, x - 2α),
(z, x - α), (z, x - 2α). From A1 we know that:
F (x, x - 2α) - F (x - α, x - 2α) ≥ F(x, x - α) - F(x - α, x - α)
and also
F (x - 2α, x - 2α) - F (z, x - 2α) ≥ F(x - 2α, x - α) - F(z, x - α).
Using Lemma 8.1 we know that
F(x - α, x - 2α) - F(x - 2α, x - 2α) ≥ F(x - α, x - α) - F (x - 2α, x - α)
Adding the three inequalities we obtain:
F (x, x - 2α) - F (z, x - 2α) ≥ F(x, x - α) - F(z, x - α)
From (24) we obtain
F (x, x - 2α) - F (z,x - 2α) ≥ F(x, x) - F (z, x)
35
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector
3. The name is absent
4. fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences
5. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
6. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
7. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
8. WP 48 - Population ageing in the Netherlands: Demographic and financial arguments for a balanced approach
9. The name is absent
10. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China