Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations



Abstract

This paper examines the case for special and differential (S&D) treatment for developing
countries within the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and the particular instruments or
exemptions it should cover. The S&D treatment currently allowed to developing countries in
the Agreement and the use they have made of it is first described. The range of proposals put
forward by developing countries (and by development NGOs in developed countries) is
summarised, and the S&D provisions in the August 2004 Framework Agreement for
Establishing Modalities in Agriculture are outlined. The reasons why developing countries
want special and differential treatment under the AoA are discussed. Some of the main
proposals in the Development Box are then reviewed in the light of the justifications
presented by its proponents. The paper concludes that the potential exists in the Framework
Agreement to take a significant step towards “operationally effective and meaningful
provisions” for S&D treatment. While noting this positive outcome, the important objective
for developing countries of gaining a reduction in the trade-distorting support and protection
by developed countries should not be forgotten.



More intriguing information

1. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
2. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE
3. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
4. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
5. BODY LANGUAGE IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN LARGE GROUPS
6. The name is absent
7. Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers
8. The name is absent
9. The Veblen-Gerschenkron Effect of FDI in Mezzogiorno and East Germany
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
13. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
14. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
15. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN TENNESSEE ON WATER USE AND CONTROL - AGRICULTURAL PHASES
16. The name is absent
17. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
18. The name is absent
19. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY
20. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt