Sector Switching: An Unexplored Dimension of Firm Dynamics in Developing Countries



that produce products from different sub-sectors, so our sample is restricted to 44,712
observations on 20,521 manufacturing firms.17

[TABLE 1 ABOUT HERE]

For the production function analysis, the output variable is defined as the gross value
added of the firm deflated by the industrial output price index relevant to the two-digit
sub-sector. It is constructed by adding total labour costs to gross profit. Inputs include
(i) labour, measured as the total number of persons employed at the end of the year in
question,18 and (ii) capital, measured as the total assets of the firm at the end of the year
deflated by a capital price series. Descriptive statistics are presented in Table 2.

[TABLE 2 ABOUT HERE]

Table 3 outlines the number of sector switchers, exits and entrants in the sample. Sector
switching “OUT” counts the number of firms, which change main production sector
(two-digit ISIC) in the subsequent year. Similarly, sector switching “IN” documents the
number of firms that have just entered a new sector as compared to the previous year.
We are interested in comparing firms that fall into the sector switching “OUT” and “IN”
categories to “real” exits and new entrants, respectively. Around 4.6 percent (on
average) switch out of a given sector each year. This is somewhat below the average
number of exit firms (8-10 percent on average exit each year, depending on the sample
considered). Even larger differences exist between sector switchers “IN” and new
entrants, mainly due to the nature of the data (registered firms).19

[TABLE 3 ABOUT HERE]

17 As a robustness check we also consider the sub-sample of firms which remain in the sample for the
entire period, thus eliminating the impact of exit/entry decisions.

18 All firms with four employees or less are excluded from the analysis, representing around 20 percent of
the total sample in all years.

19 Given that only registered firms under the enterprise law are covered makes analysing several aspects
of firm entry problematic. Firms entering in 2002, 2003 or 2004 may have existed for several years before
registering, and therefore do not constitute entrants in strict terms. Registration involves several benefits
to firms (easier access to credit etc.). However it also makes firms more visible to government authorities
(and especially tax collectors). It is therefore uncertain during which stage in their life-cycle a firm
decides or is forced to register. Moreover, the post 2001 surveys did not collect information on
establishment year. Given the nature of the data we therefore focus most of our attention on efficiency
differentials between incumbents, exits and sector switching firms in what follows.

13



More intriguing information

1. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
2. The name is absent
3. LAND-USE EVALUATION OF KOCAELI UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS AREA
4. On the Real Exchange Rate Effects of Higher Electricity Prices in South Africa
5. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
6. Spousal Labor Market Effects from Government Health Insurance: Evidence from a Veterans Affairs Expansion
7. The name is absent
8. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?
9. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
10. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
11. Foreign direct investment in the Indian telecommunications sector
12. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
13. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
14. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE
18. Robust Econometrics
19. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
20. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure