the distribution of asylum burdens. This means that initiatives in which
policy makers have placed great hope in their attempt to overcome the
ineptitude of unilateral efforts to steer migration flows might not only be
ineffective, but indeed counterproductive, in addressing the problem of
international burden-sharing in this area.
References
Barsky, R.F. (1995), ‘Arguing the American Dream a la Canada: former Soviet
Citizens’ Justification for their choice of host country, Journal ofRefugee
Studies, 8(2), 125-41.
Barsky, R.F. (2000), Arguing and Justifying: Assessing the Convention Refugees'
Choice ofMoment, Motive and Host Country, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Beck, N. (2001), Time-Series-Cross-Section DATA: What have we learned in the
past few years?, Annual Review ofPolitical Science, Vol. 4, pp. 271-93.
Beck, N. and J. Katz (1995), What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-
section data, American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 634-47.
Boecker, A and T Havinga (1998), Asylum Migration to the European Union:
Patterns of Origin and Destination, Luxembourg: Office for Official
Publications of the European Communities.
Boecker, A and T. Havinga (1999), country of asylum by choice or by chance:
asylum-seekers in Belgium, the Netherlands and the UK, Journal ofEthnic
and Migration Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 43-61.
Borjas, George (1990), Friends or Strangers: The Impact ofimmigrants on the
U.S. Economy, New York: Basic Books.
Crisp, Jeff (1999), 'Who has counted the refugees?'INHCR and the politics of
numbers, New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 12, Policy
Research Unit, Geneva: UNHCR.
ECRE (European Council on Refugees and Exiles) (2000), Non-State Agents of
Persecution and the Inability of the State to Protect, ECRE Working Paper,
September.
Fassmann, H. and R. Muenz (1992), Patterns and trends of international
migration in Western Europe, Population and Development Review, Vol. 18,
No. 3, pp. 457-80.
Fawcett, J.T. (1989), Networks, linkages and migration systems, International
Migration Review, Vol. 23, No.3, pp. 671-80.
Freeman, G.P. (1994), Migration Policy and Politics in Receiving States,
International Migration Review, Vol. 26, No. 4 (winter), pp. 1144-67.
Freeman, Gary P. (1994), Can Liberal States Control Unwanted Migration?,
Annals of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social Science, Vol. 534
(July), pp. 17-30.
Guiraudon, V. and Lahav, G. (2000), A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty
Debate. The Case of Migration Control, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33,
No. 2, pp. 163-95.
34
More intriguing information
1. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Should informal sector be subsidised?
5. Determinants of U.S. Textile and Apparel Import Trade
6. The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning
7. Private tutoring at transition points in the English education system: its nature, extent and purpose
8. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
9. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
10. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile