Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar

References

CEC 2005a. ‘Action Plan on accompanying measures for Sugar Protocol countries affected
by the reform of the EU sugar regime’, Commission Staff Working Paper, SEC(2005) 61, 17
January. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

CEC 2005b. ‘Reforming the European Union’s sugar policy: Update of impact assessment
[SEC(2003) 1022]. COM(2005)263 final’, Commission Staff Working Document,
SEC(2005) 808, 22 June. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Chaplin, H. and Matthews, A., 2005. Coping with the Fall-out for Preference-Receiving
Countries from EU Sugar Reform, IIIS Discussion Paper # 100, Trinity College Dublin.

EU Council 2005. ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation on the common organization of the
markets in the sugar sector; Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No
1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common
agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers; Proposal for a
Council Regulation establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar
industry in the European Community and amending Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 on the
financing of the common agricultural policy = Presidency compromise (in agreement with the
Commission’, Interinstitutional file 2005/0118 (CNS), 2005/0119 (CNS), 2005/0120 (CNS).
Brussels: Council of the European Union.

Stevens, C. and Kennan, J., 2006. Agricultural Reciprocity under Economic Partnership
Agreements, IIIS Discussion Paper, Trinity College Dublin.

18

<<   17   18   19   20  

More intriguing information