Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar



Why unwinding preferences is not the same as
liberalisation: the case of sugar

Christopher Stevens

Abstract

Many of the changes to developed country trade policy that affect developing countries do
not fit neatly into the category of ‘liberalisation’ yet they are frequently assessed as if they
did. The recent changes to the EU’s regimes for production and imports of sugar fall into this
group: both production and trade policies were highly distorted before the change and will
remain so after it, but the distribution of the effects of these distortions will be altered. This
will affect three of the six Development Cooperation Ireland programme countries in Africa:
Mozambique, Tanzania and Zambia. Returns from sugar exports to the EU will be less than
otherwise would have been. How much lower depends critically on how the sugar market
develops after 2009.

JEL: Q18, Q12

Key words:

Sugar, liberalisation, value chains



More intriguing information

1. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
2. The name is absent
3. Unemployment in an Interdependent World
4. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
5. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
6. The name is absent
7. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
8. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
9. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
10. The name is absent