Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996



Table 4: Net Cross-Sectional Polarization Responsiveness to

Unemployment for Men and Women, 1982-1996

Men

Women

Beyond 50% of median
marginal UR effect

0.687

0.432

(4.51)

(4.75)

Change in VL and VH
marginal UR effect

0.611

0.363

(4.66)

(6.14)

Change in VL and L
marginal UR effect

0.789

-0.035

(17.5)

(0.43)

Change in VL
marginal UR effect

0.496

0.078

(16.4)

(1.37)

Change in VH and H
marginal UR effect

-0.102

0.467

(0.73)

(17.8)

Change in VH
marginal UR effect

0.115

0.285

(0.93)

(13.4)

Note: See notes to Table 2. Figures in parentheses are absolute values of “t-ratios”.
Coefficients are marginal effects as defined in the text.

Table 5: Net Cross-Sectional Upward/Downward Responsiveness
to Unemployment in Earnings Distributions for

Men and Women, 1982-1996

Men              Women

Change in top three to

-1.195

1.286

bottom three EIs

(12.6)

(15.2)

Change in top two to

-0.892

0.502

bottom two EIs

(6.32)

(6.37)

Note: See notes to Table 3. Coefficients are marginal effects as defined in the text. Figures
in parentheses are absolute values of “t-ratios”.

466


Charles M. Beach and Ross Finnie



More intriguing information

1. Structural Influences on Participation Rates: A Canada-U.S. Comparison
2. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry
3. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
4. How Offshoring Can Affect the Industries’ Skill Composition
5. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
6. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
7. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
8. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China
9. Fertility in Developing Countries
10. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act