The name is absent



whereas men in the 1958 cohort study who were interviewed at age 33 reported
drinking an average of 25.1 units of alcohol at age 23, those who were not
subsequently included in the age 33 sweep reported drinking an average of 27.3 units
of alcohol.

A T-test was used to analyse data from each sweep to ascertain whether there are
significant differences between the group of individuals successfully interviewed at the
next sweep and the group missing at the next sweep. Figures in Table 8a and Table
8b have been highlighted in bold where the differences reach the 0.05 level of
significance. In summary, it can be seen that for men in both the 1958 and 1970
cohorts there is a tendency for heavy drinkers to be less likely to be successfully
interviewed at the next sweep. The only difference which does not reach significance
for male cohort members is for the data collected from the postal survey at age 26. In
all other cases, those who are successfully interviewed at the next sweep report
drinking approximately two units less on average than those missing from the next
sweep. The results for women are less clear cut. There is a tendency for those
successfully interviewed at the next sweep to report drinking fewer units of alcohol per
week than those missing at the next sweep. However, this only reaches significance
for the data collected from the 1958 cohort at age 42.

Table 8a: Reported mean number of alcohol units consumed per week (1958
cohort) disaggregated by whether the cohort member is interviewed in the next
sweep

Men______________________________

Women_______________________

Present at next
sweep___________

Missin
sweep

g at next
(1)

Present at next
sweep___________

Missin
sweep

g at next
υ)

Age
(year)

Mean

Stdev

N

Mean

Stdev

N

Mean

Stdev

N

Mean

Stdev

N

23
(1981)

25.1

24.9

4304

27.3

27.4

1321

ɪe

10.0

3659

“91

11.9

825

33
(1991)

19.2

20.1

4111

22.0

25.9

718

“69

“82

3626

~T∏

11.9

468

42
(2000)

25.4

28.6

3862

28.1

31.6

1018

9.4

10.8

3617

11.1

16.6

772

Table 8b: Reported mean number of alcohol units consumed per week
(1970cohort) disaggregated by whether the cohort member is interviewed in the
next sweep

Men______________________________

Women_______________________

Present at next
sweep___________

Missing at next
sweep ʊ)___________

Present at next
sweep___________

Missing at next
sweep (1)___________

Age
(year)

Mean

Stdev

N

Mean

Stdev

N

Mean

Stdev

N

Mean

Stdev

N

26
(1996)

22.0

19.7

2813

23.8

23.4

561

1“4

H

2890

“94

10.4

418

30
(2000)

28.21

30.1

3736

33.55

41.0

1019

H

12.7

3519

10.4

13.7

717

(1) Note that this will include cases missing at the next sweep due to death,
immigration, non-contact and refusal

21



More intriguing information

1. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
5. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
6. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
7. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
8. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
9. New issues in Indian macro policy.
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
13. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
14. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
15. AGRICULTURAL TRADE IN THE URUGUAY ROUND: INTO FINAL BATTLE
16. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
17. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
18. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
19. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
20. Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European