Figure 8. Sensitivity of Optimal Hedge Ratios in Response to Transaction Cost
Year 1
With CCP
No CCP
Optimal Hedge Ratio
0.4230
0.4225
0.4220
0.4215
0.4210
0.4205
0.4200
0.4195
0.4190
о.
y Yrl (With CCP)
о Yrl (No CCP)
-■Linear (Yrl (With CCP))
Linear (Yrl (No CCP))
•ж
ζ^v Ç?' ζy, ςp4 PP Pv1
ÿ’ 'ÿ 'ÿ c, 'ÿ c>, c>,
ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>-
<∙∙α.
× <Γ'⅛4
ж <>■
ж
0.6120
0.6115
0.6110
0.6105
0.6100
0.6095
0.6090
0.6085
0.6080
cΛ- A Λ √⅛ √× √⅛ √b Л A Λ r<V
C?3 ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? cλ.4d
43 ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- 43
Transaction Cost ($)
43
More intriguing information
1. Ronald Patterson, Violinist; Brooks Smith, Pianist2. Une nouvelle vision de l'économie (The knowledge society: a new approach of the economy)
3. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
4. The name is absent
5. Giant intra-abdominal hydatid cysts with multivisceral locations
6. Cultural Neuroeconomics of Intertemporal Choice
7. Economies of Size for Conventional Tillage and No-till Wheat Production
8. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
9. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
10. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS