Figure 8. Sensitivity of Optimal Hedge Ratios in Response to Transaction Cost
Year 1
With CCP
No CCP
Optimal Hedge Ratio
0.4230
0.4225
0.4220
0.4215
0.4210
0.4205
0.4200
0.4195
0.4190
о.
y Yrl (With CCP)
о Yrl (No CCP)
-■Linear (Yrl (With CCP))
Linear (Yrl (No CCP))
•ж
ζ^v Ç?' ζy, ςp4 PP Pv1
ÿ’ 'ÿ 'ÿ c, 'ÿ c>, c>,
ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>-
<∙∙α.
× <Γ'⅛4
ж <>■
ж
0.6120
0.6115
0.6110
0.6105
0.6100
0.6095
0.6090
0.6085
0.6080
cΛ- A Λ √⅛ √× √⅛ √b Л A Λ r<V
C?3 ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? cλ.4d
43 ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- 43
Transaction Cost ($)
43
More intriguing information
1. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?2. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
3. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
4. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
5. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
9. The Values and Character Dispositions of 14-16 Year Olds in the Hodge Hill Constituency
10. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information