Figure 8. Sensitivity of Optimal Hedge Ratios in Response to Transaction Cost
Year 1
With CCP
No CCP
Optimal Hedge Ratio
0.4230
0.4225
0.4220
0.4215
0.4210
0.4205
0.4200
0.4195
0.4190
о.
y Yrl (With CCP)
о Yrl (No CCP)
-■Linear (Yrl (With CCP))
Linear (Yrl (No CCP))
•ж
ζ^v Ç?' ζy, ςp4 PP Pv1
ÿ’ 'ÿ 'ÿ c, 'ÿ c>, c>,
ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>-
<∙∙α.
× <Γ'⅛4
ж <>■
ж
0.6120
0.6115
0.6110
0.6105
0.6100
0.6095
0.6090
0.6085
0.6080
cΛ- A Λ √⅛ √× √⅛ √b Л A Λ r<V
C?3 ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? cλ.4d
43 ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- 43
Transaction Cost ($)
43
More intriguing information
1. The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector2. The name is absent
3. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration
4. Fiscal Reform and Monetary Union in West Africa
5. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52
6. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
7. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
8. The mental map of Dutch entrepreneurs. Changes in the subjective rating of locations in the Netherlands, 1983-1993-2003
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent