Figure 8. Sensitivity of Optimal Hedge Ratios in Response to Transaction Cost
Year 1
With CCP
No CCP
Optimal Hedge Ratio
0.4230
0.4225
0.4220
0.4215
0.4210
0.4205
0.4200
0.4195
0.4190
о.
y Yrl (With CCP)
о Yrl (No CCP)
-■Linear (Yrl (With CCP))
Linear (Yrl (No CCP))
•ж
ζ^v Ç?' ζy, ςp4 PP Pv1
ÿ’ 'ÿ 'ÿ c, 'ÿ c>, c>,
ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>-
<∙∙α.
× <Γ'⅛4
ж <>■
ж
0.6120
0.6115
0.6110
0.6105
0.6100
0.6095
0.6090
0.6085
0.6080
cΛ- A Λ √⅛ √× √⅛ √b Л A Λ r<V
C?3 ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? ς? cλ.4d
43 ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- ç>- 43
Transaction Cost ($)
43
More intriguing information
1. Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity2. European Integration: Some stylised facts
3. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems
4. The name is absent
5. Studying How E-Markets Evaluation Can Enhance Trust in Virtual Business Communities
6. From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli
7. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
8. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
9. Feature type effects in semantic memory: An event related potentials study
10. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke