Abstract
Chemical companies generally support environmental regulatory segregation Canadian
and U.S. agricultural chemical markets, apparently because it enables them to practice
third order price discrimination. This study provides new cross section evidence that
suggests price discrimination is practiced. We examine the potential implications
chemical market desegregation for agricultural chemical prices, farmer welfare, and
consumer welfare.
Key words: price discrimination, agricultural chemicals, economic welfare
More intriguing information
1. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test2. The name is absent
3. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
4. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
5. Structural Breakpoints in Volatility in International Markets
6. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
7. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
8. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
9. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
10. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?