Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California



support for local governments that struggle with these issues would be been in place (Nelson &
French 2002).

Disaster relief

If an hazard event causes losses that exceed the state’s capability to respond to and recover
from, the governor of that state can request a ‘presidential declaration’ from the president. If
the request is approved, the hazard event is a declared disaster and FEMA will then provide
funds for disaster relief to the affected states. The costs of this disaster relief aid are enormous.
In 1992, hurricane Andrew caused damages of over $25 billion, and FEMA appointed $1.64
billion in disaster aid. In 1993, the Midwest Floods caused at least $12 billion in damages, and
FEMA appointed $875 million in disaster aid. In 1994, the Northridge earthquake caused
damages of $20 billion, and FEMA appointed $3.3 billion in disaster aid. The funds for this
disaster relief come from various programs, including the National Flood Insurance Program
and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Godschalk 1999,
Briechle 1999).

During the last decade, there have been one or more of these disasters almost every year.
Because of the immense costs, FEMA is slowly changing its policy. Pre-disaster mitigation is
more cost-effective and prevents losses of all sorts. Because of this, FEMA has slowly begun
to expand the coverage of the Stafford Act and the NFIP to pre-disaster mitigation measures.
FEMA is also changing the policies on who is eligible for disaster relief. In the National
Mitigation Goal, FEMA states that “those who knowingly choose to assume greater risk must
accept responsibility for that choice” (Godschalk 1999, p. 12) and in the future can be excluded
from disaster aid. The same holds true for households that did not purchase natural hazard
insurance. They too can in the future be excluded from disaster aid. Before individuals can be
held completely responsible for their decision to live in a high-risk area, it is necessary to
increase public awareness and ensure full hazard disclosure. For now, FEMA will focus on
these necessities before introducing this new policy of personal responsibility (Godschalk
1999).

Structural mitigation projects

The most important mitigation funding programs are the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
HMGP, and the National Flood Insurance Program NFIP. Both the HMGP and the NFIP were
originally meant for post-disaster relief. The HMGP stems from the sections 404, 406 and 409

16



More intriguing information

1. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
2. Multi-Agent System Interaction in Integrated SCM
3. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
7. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
11. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke
12. Plasmid-Encoded Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella typhi and some Enteric Bacteria in and around Kolkata, India: A Preliminary Study
13. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
14. The problem of anglophone squint
15. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas
16. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
17. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
18. Informal Labour and Credit Markets: A Survey.
19. Equity Markets and Economic Development: What Do We Know
20. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics