Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California



Factual basis

Goal definition

Balancing
interests

Mitigation
policies

səɪɔɪɪod
iɪoin:nɪɔuɪɔiduɪɪ

Hazard maps

Evacuation
routes

Clearances

Peak load water
requirements

Orange County_____

+ +

+

+

+ +

+

+ +

0

0

0

Anaheim__________

+ +

+

0

+

0

+ +

0

0

0

Costa Mesa________

+

01)

0

+

0

+ +

+ +

0

+

Dana Point_________

+

+

0

+ +

0

+

+ +

0

0

Fullerton_____________

+

+

0

+

+

+

0

0

0

Irvine________________

+

01)

0

+ +

0

+ +

0

0

0

Orange____________

+

+

0

+

+

+

+

0

0

San Clemente______

+ +

+ +

0

+ +

+ +

+ +

0

0

0

San Juan Capistrano

+

+

0

+ +

+

+ +

0

0

0

Table 4.7 Natural hazard mitigation elements in General Plans in Orange County

1) The goal definition was not completely absent, but merely stated something like ‘reduce the risks to the
community’ without any further specifications.

4.3.3 Natural hazard mitigation in Los Angeles County

On the following pages, the evaluation of the safety elements in Los Angeles County is
provided. Table 4.8 shows in what general plan elements natural hazard mitigation is
discussed, and the year of adoption, or the last updating, of the element. Table 4.9 shows what
hazards the element deals with. Table 4.10 provides an overview of the findings of the
evaluation of the plan contents.

_______Locality_______

______________Element(s)______________

Year

Los Angeles County

Safety____________________________________

1993

Carson______________

Safety____________________________________

2004

El Segundo__________

Public Safety____________________________

1992

Glendale_____________

Safety____________________________________

2003

Long Beach_________

Public Safety____________________________

1975

Los Angeles_________

Safety____________________________________

1996

Malibu_____________

Safety and Health______________________

1995

Pasadena____________

Safety____________________________________

2002

Sierra Madre_________

Hazards Prevention____________________

1996

Table 4.8 Natural hazard mitigation elements in General Plans in Los Angeles County

29



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI
3. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
4. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan
5. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
6. The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach
7. The name is absent
8. Biological Control of Giant Reed (Arundo donax): Economic Aspects
9. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
10. The name is absent
11. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
12. The name is absent
13. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
14. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry
18. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent