Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland



1999. In general terms the benchmarks therefore suggest a stronger innovation profile
in the Republic of Ireland than in Northern Ireland but innovative activity continues to
lag well behind that in the German study regions. The need - recognised in recent
policy statements and expenditure announcements - is to significantly increase the
level of R&D spending and to continue the process of institutional capabilities to
support firms’ innovative activity.

Of the three study regions, however, Bavaria is alone in achieving increases in the
extent and success of product innovation for each plant sizeband over the 1993-99
period. While this may reflect the development of more high-tech industry in the
region, it is a development which has been accompanied by significant government
spending and institutional developments. For example, from 1992-97 there was a
sharp increase in the basic support by Lander and Federal government in Germany for
science in Bavaria, with spending increasing 25 per cent in nominal terms compared
to a 12.7 per cent increase in the old Lander and a 12.2 per cent rise in Baden-
Württemberg. Similarly, institutional developments in Bavaria were made to support
high-tech industry and innovation including the establishment of the Bavarian
Research Foundation in 1991 to foster collaborative research in new technologies,
Bayern Innovativ (1995) set up to stimulate technology transfer to SMEs and parallel
developments in provision of venture capital (e.g. Bayern Kapital Landshut). Despite
these developments links between firms and institutional innovation partners in
Bavaria remain relatively underdeveloped as does the extent of multi-functional
working.

In more general terms, the benchmark comparisons suggest little evidence of
convergence between innovative activity in the study regions. In terms of the extent of
innovation, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland continue to lag increasingly
behind plants in Bavaria. In terms of the success of innovation the situation is even
more stark with Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland losing ground relative to
Bavaria. Accounting for these performance differences in terms of the efficiency with
which plants in each area innovate is difficult given the overall similarity (or
advantage of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland) in terms of intra-firm co-
ordination and inter-firm linkages. More convincing are arguments related simply to
the extent of the regions’ commitment and investments in R&D and innovation. To

21



More intriguing information

1. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
2. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
3. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE
4. Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
5. The name is absent
6. Empirically Analyzing the Impacts of U.S. Export Credit Programs on U.S. Agricultural Export Competitiveness
7. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
8. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
9. Auction Design without Commitment
10. Nonparametric cointegration analysis
11. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection
12. The name is absent
13. Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
17. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent