Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification



provided by Research Papers in Economics

Regional Differentiation in the Russian Federation - a Cluster-based Typification

Michael STEINER,Dept. of Economics,University of Graz and Institute for
Technology and Regional Poicy, Joanneum Research Graz/Vienna, Vladimir
BOIKOV, Centre of Sociology Studies, Moscow, Boris FROLOV, Russian Academy
of Public Administration, Moscow, Franz HISS, B-Plan Eschweiler

PRELIMINARY VERSION. PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE!

Abstract

The paper presents an empirical typology of the regions of the Russian Federation
(RF). Based on indicators defining the socio-economic situation of all 89 regions
(federation subjects) of the RF, the paper allows for a type-wise characterisation of
regions identified according to their outstanding economy-related problems. Using
a procedure for region's ordering within multidimensional space (region's ranking)
in relation to the base year 1992 and within year-to-year series (1993,1994) a
clustering of all RF regions according to their principal type and problem character
is obtained. The resulting typification provides a methodological and procedural
basis for monitoring the socio-economic situation in the regions of the RF, can be
helpful in preparing scientific foundations of a comprehensive trageted government
program and presents an element for further studies on regional development in
the Russian Federation.



More intriguing information

1. Yield curve analysis
2. The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South
3. The name is absent
4. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
5. Keystone sector methodology:network analysis comparative study
6. Computing optimal sampling designs for two-stage studies
7. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL
8. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
9. National curriculum assessment: how to make it better
10. The name is absent