The Clustering of Financial Services in London*



Table 4: Recruitment of Staff (all grades) from South East England

<61%

61-80%

81-100%

TOTAL

Banking__________________

Count____________

________16.0

________12.0

________16.0

________44.0

Expected Count

________13.1

_________8.2

_________22.7

________44.0

Insurance___________________

Count____________

________13.0

__________6.0

________40.0

________59.0

Expected Count

________17.5

________11.0

________30.5

________59.0

Legal services________________

Count____________

________15.0

________14.0

________31.0

________60.0

Expected Count

________17.8

________11.2

________31.0

________60.0

Investment banking_________

Count____________

__________9.0

__________5.0

__________6.0

________20.0

Expected Count

_________5.9

_____________3.7

________10.3

________20.0

Fund management_________

Count____________

___________1.0

__________4.0

________12.0

________17.0

Expected Count

_________5.0

_________3.2

__________8.8

________17.0

Management consultancy

Count____________

________14.0

__________3.0

________13.0

________30.0

Expected Count

_________8.9

____________5.6

________15.5

________30.0

Accounting_________________

Count____________

__________5.0

__________2.0

__________9.0

________16.0

Expected Count

____________4.7

_________3.0

_________8.3

________16.0

TOTAL

Count____________

________73.0

________46.0

127.0

246.0

Expected Count

________73.0

________46.0

127.0

246.0

Responses on commuting patterns in the interview survey revealed that in many cases
staff tend to come from specific areas in and around London and that ease of access for
skilled client facing, secretarial and back office staff to an existing central London office
would be a key factor ruling out a significant change of location. The concentration of
transport nodes around the City was seen as a major advantage in terms of staff
recruitment. In banks and legal firms, high earning skilled staff were said to favor living in
the more expensive outer boroughs of London, for example, Richmond-upon-Thames and
Wimbledon, or the West End, for example Kensington, or the rural commuter belt. Some
senior staff preferred to commute weekly to London and retained central London flats
convenient for the office. There was also evidence of some inter-city weekly commuting to
London from other UK and European cities by senior staff. Skilled support staff tend to
live further from the center of London, either in the suburbs or outside London where
housing prices are lower. Distance from central London was related to age, household
circumstances, and cost. Younger skilled staff were said to favor living in fashionable and
convenient central London districts while older staff of all grades with children were said to
move further out from the center in spite of added commuting time and cost. The location
of favored schools emerged as an important housing location factor in some interviews.

The ability to recruit senior staff via informal channels was signaled as an important
advantage of operating in a compact geographical space. Not surprisingly, informal

16



More intriguing information

1. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
2. The name is absent
3. PRIORITIES IN THE CHANGING WORLD OF AGRICULTURE
4. On Evolution of God-Seeking Mind
5. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
6. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
7. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
8. The name is absent
9. Les freins culturels à l'adoption des IFRS en Europe : une analyse du cas français
10. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -