Provided by Research Papers in Economics
The Institutional Determinants OfBilateral Trade Patterns
paper to be presented at the ERSA 2003 Congress
in Jyvaskyla, Finland
Henri L.F. de Groota, Gert-Jan Lindersa, Piet Rietvelda and Uma Subramanianbl
a Department of Spatial Economics, Vrije Universiteit, The Netherlands
b World Bank, Washington, United States
Abstract
This paper studies the effect of institutions on trade flows, using a gravity model approach. We start from a
standard gravity equation that incorporates geographical proximity, language, trade policy and common
history. These factors reflect the costs of trade across geographical and cultural distances. The quality of
governance and the extent of familiarity with the resulting framework of rules and norms also affect the costs
of doing business between any pair of countries. This paper extends the gravity equation to include proxies
for institutional quality and institutional homogeneity between trade partners. For this, we use indicators on
political stability, regulatory quality, and other proxies that reflect the quality of governance. We test whether
institutional homogeneity and institutional quality have an independent impact on trade volume between pairs
of countries. We find that having a similar law or regulatory framework promotes bilateral trade by 12% to
18%. Furthermore, a better quality of formal institutions on average coincides with higher trade. An increase
in regulatory quality of one standard deviation from the mean leads to an estimated increase of 20 to 24% in
bilateral trade. Lower corruption similarly accounts for 17 to 27% extra trade.
JEL codes: F14
Keywords: bilateral trade flows, gravity model, institutions
More intriguing information
1. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?2. The name is absent
3. Infrastructure Investment in Network Industries: The Role of Incentive Regulation and Regulatory Independence
4. sycnoιogιcaι spaces
5. Trade Openness and Volatility
6. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions
7. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
8. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
9. The name is absent
10. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals