The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -



Implementing the InnoRegio-program: Process and state of project approval;
assessment of the program

Transforming project ideas into viable project proposals worthy of receiving support at first
progressed very slowly, partly because of problems with the support regulations, and partly
because of the applicants’ lack of experience. To speed up the process, special consultation
routines were established. The support management team is important in this respect; it is
comprised of InnoRegio actors and advisors commissioned by project backers to implement
the program. Joint meetings with the applicants contributed to a faster resolution of problem
areas in the support arrangements and sped up the decision-making process. Despite some
initial problems, the participants overwhelmingly judged the support concept and the
individual benefits of the InnoRegio to be positive (Table 1)4. Probably acceptance partly
results from the considerable number new partners especially acquired for R&D (Table 1).

Table 1

Assessment of the InnoRegio promotion by the participants of the networks
In %

The participants ...

statement is ...

incorrect

not really
correct

partly
correct

mainly
correct

correct

total

started projects/planed projects, that
otherwise not had been realized

14

7

22

22

35

100

started projects/planed projects in a larger
scale/extend

22

7

26

20

25

100

got new contacts to regional ...

universities/- of applied sciences

22

7

26

17

28

ÏÔÔ

institutions of advanced training

43

15

19

11

12

100

labour administration

57

16

16

6

5

100

companies

7

5

25

27

35

ÏÔÔ

acquired new customers

44

15

24

7

10

1ÔÔ

acquired new suppliers

58

15

17

5

5

100

acquired new cooperation partners for ...

R&D-activities

14

8

23

26

29

1ÔÔ

production

51

10

16

13

10

1ÔÔ

(advanced) vocational training

40

12

22

13

12

1ÔÔ

upshot: Take part on InnoRegio is already
worthwhile

ÏÔ

13

39

17

1ÔÔ

Source: Survey by DIW Berlin + Partner in the InnoRegio networks,
summer 2001.

DIW Berlin

2002

The survey and interviews conducted in the framework of this study, as well as the project
backers’ statements point to marked differences between the networks in the project
approval process. Of the 19 InnoRegio networks that were already classed as being worthy
of support, four received early approval for support for their first projects, six needed to have
4
In comparison to the survey from the previous year the approval has even grown.

13



More intriguing information

1. WP 36 - Women's Preferences or Delineated Policies? The development or part-time work in the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom
2. The name is absent
3. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
4. The name is absent
5. Skills, Partnerships and Tenancy in Sri Lankan Rice Farms
6. Who is missing from higher education?
7. Picture recognition in animals and humans
8. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
9. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
10. The name is absent
11. Insurance within the firm
12. Announcement effects of convertible bond loans versus warrant-bond loans: An empirical analysis for the Dutch market
13. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
14. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds
15. Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks
16. Sex-gender-sexuality: how sex, gender, and sexuality constellations are constituted in secondary schools
17. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
18. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
19. The name is absent
20. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY