A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities



INFORMATIVE PRIOR DIFFUSE PRIOR

NORTH

CENTER

SOUTH

NORTH

CENTER

SOUTH

σ###KL

0.17028

0.09648

0.10434

0.257961

0.221143

0.15507

st. err.

0.09366

0.06717

0.07662

0.23078

0.23160

0.15097

^##KK

-0.33486

-0.20167

-0.19176

-0.48632

-0.46109

-0.28678

st. err.

0.18358

0.59734

0.14077

0.43966

0.48857

0.28159

σ≡LΓ-

-0.08674

-0.04622

-0.05686

-0.13714

-0.10641

-0.08406

st. err.

0.05737

0.03249

0.04198

0.12373

0.11238

0.08179

ε≡KΓ^

0.11312

0.06592

0.06819

0.16846

0.14935

0.100591

st. err.

0.06191

0.04525

0.04892

0.15077

0.15653

0.09812

ε≡LK-

0.05764

0.03155

0.03713

0.08949

0.07178

0.05448

st. err.

0.03172

0.02181

0.02679

0.08030

0.07539

0.05296

£###KK

-0.11312

-0.06592

-0.06819

-0.16846

-0.14935

-0.10059

st. err.

0.06191

0.04525

0.04892

0.15077

0.15653

0.09812

ε≡LΓ-

-0.05764

-0.03155

-0.03713

-0.08949

-0.07179

-0.05448

st. err.

0.03172

0.02181

0.02679

0.08030

0.07539

0.05296

TABLE 4 - Elasticities conditional on 1989 (Y,t,w/r) with inequality constraints

Moments are quite dissimilar with a diffuse prior. For instance the expected
capital labor substitution elasticity for the Center is double than with a proper prior, but
no general pattern can be easily detected. However, it is very interesting to notice how
the posterior odds in favor of concavity (given by the ratio of accepted samples) varies
with regions. With a proper prior, in North the probability is in line with earlier findings
by Chalfant and Wallace (1992) and is approximately about 0.538, while it declines in
Center (0.397) and further in South (0.357). This is even more striking when we adopt a
diffuse prior. Odds are very against concavity in South (0.043) and Center (0.102),
while in North it is equal to 0.213. We can notice how neoclassical theory deteriorates
in Southern regions. This is coherent with our previous findings since elasticities
densities mostly don’t cover neoclassical space in South. From an economic point of
view, we notice how elasticities are higher in North but still quite low and that
technology in South is very close to a Leontief production function. I would like to
remark that, contrary to Guilkey and Lovell (1981), even with substitution elasticities

15



More intriguing information

1. Fiscal Reform and Monetary Union in West Africa
2. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
3. Global Excess Liquidity and House Prices - A VAR Analysis for OECD Countries
4. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
5. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?
6. The name is absent
7. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?