A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities



general we have two choices. First we can claim to know to have no information, but
neoclassical properties. In this case our prior is a Jeffrey’s non informative or diffuse
prior that satisfies neoclassical constraints. As we see below, in our standard linear
regression model, this is to assume:

f (β,σ)- I(β^

where I(β, ~y) is an indicator function equal to one when neoclassical constraints are
satisfied and zero otherwise.

The second possibility is to form a proper prior that expresses our a priori
knowledge about the phenomenon under investigation. I claim that any empirical
analysis in regional science can be cast with a proper prior since we always have data at
the national lavel. Therefore we can elicit a convenient prior derived from national data
for the same parameters in which we are interested. Formally in the general linear model
we can consider:

f (β, σ) I (β, ~) fN (β / σ) f1G

where prior distributions are simply formed using the same model with previous or
contemporaneous national data. However this procedure is not completely automatic,
since we can always monitor these distributions in a appropriate way. If for instance the
regional data belong to an “important” region, whose share is relevant, we can give a lot
of weight to this prior. On the other hand for marginal regions we can choose to make
this prior distribution more diffuse simply controlling some a priori distribution
parameters. Therefore this approach is flexible enough to suit regional science
practitioners without resorting to complex and demanding aggregation theories.

Finally I would like to stress that bayesian econometrics appear to be the only
feasible solution if we consider the huge variety of phenomena in regional science, as it
doesn’t pretend to discover the “true” model or the “true” data generating process.
Perhaps in regional science we are more interested to study interregional differences and
explain for instance why certain regions grow and others don’t. When we compare
regions we are better off if we specify a general common model within which we can

1 Classical refrence are Zellner (1971), Press (1972), Box and Tsiao (1973) while updated text are
O’Hagan (1995), Bernardo and Smith (1994).



More intriguing information

1. On the job rotation problem
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The Economic Value of Basin Protection to Improve the Quality and Reliability of Potable Water Supply: Some Evidence from Ecuador
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Legal Minimum Wages and the Wages of Formal and Informal Sector Workers in Costa Rica
11. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
12. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
13. The name is absent
14. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence
15. Constrained School Choice
16. The name is absent
17. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
18. Federal Tax-Transfer Policy and Intergovernmental Pre-Commitment
19. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
20. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation