Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program



Walls, Nelson, Safirova


Telecommuting and Environmental Policy

Diesel Technology Forum. 2003. Cleaner Air Better Performance: Strategies for Upgrading and Modermnzing
Diesel Engines
. Frederick, MD. May.

Drury, R.T., M.E. Belliveau, J.S. Kuhn, and S. Bansal. 1999. “Pollution Trading and Environmental Injustice: Los
Angeles’ Failed Experiment in Air Quality Policy.”
Duke Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 9: 231.

Electric Utility Weekly. 2004. Platt Market Survey. June.

Energy Information Administration. 2003. Analysis of S. 485, the Clear Skies Act of 2003 and S. 843, the Clear
Planning Act of 2003. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Deparment of Energy,
Washington, DC. September.

Environmental Defense. 2001. “Open Market Trading: The Shortcomings of a Flawed Approach to Emissions
Trading.” White Paper. New York: Environmental Defense. May.

Federal Highway Administration. 2000a. Addendum to the 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study. FHWA-
PL-00-021. Washington, DC. May. [can’t find in text; delete and change the 2000b cites to just 2000?]

———. 2000b. Addendum to the 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study. FHWA-PL-00-021. Washington,
DC. May.

———. 2002 “Transportation and Air Quality: Selected Facts and Figures.” Brochure. Washington, DC.

Haites, E., and M. Haider. 1998. Experience with Mobile Source Emissions Trading and Its Potential Application
to Greenhouse Gas Emissions by the Transportation Sector. Toronto: National Round Table on the
Environment and the Economy.

Henderson, Dennis and Patricia Mokhtarian. 1996. “Impacts of Center-Based Telecommuting on Travel and
Emissions: Analysis of the Puget Sound Demonstration Project,”
Transportation Research D 1(1): 29-45.

Houston-Galveston Area Council (HGAC). 2000. Houston/Galveston Attainment Demonstration and Post-1999
Rate-of-Progress SIP, Appendix K: H-GAC Documentation of VMEPs
. December.

Kitamura, Ryuichi, Patricia Mokhtarian, Ram Pendyala, and Konstadinos Goulias. 1991. “An Evaluation of
Telecommuting as a Trip Reduction Measure,” University of California Transportation Center (Berkeley,
CA: University of California), August.

Koenig, Brett, Dennis Henderson, and Patricia Mokhtarian. 1996. “The Travel and Emissions Impacts of
Telecommuting for the State of California Telecommuting Pilot Project,”
Transportation Research C 4(1):
13-32.

Kruger, J., and W.A. Pizer. 2004. “The EU Emissions Trading Directive: Opportunities and Potential Pitfalls.”
RFF Discussion Paper 04-24. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. 2004. “Severe Area SIP.” Appendix G: Emission Reductions
from Transportation Control Measures, State Implementation Plan. February.

Mokhtarian, Patricia and Krishna Varma. 1998. “The Trade-Off Between Trips and Distance Traveled in
Analyzing the Emissions Impacts of Center-Based Telecommuting,”
Transportation Research D 3(6): 419-
28.

Nelson, Peter 2004. “Emissions Trading with Telecommuting Credits:

Regulatory Background and Institutional Barriers,” Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper
(November).

Nilles, J. , F. Carson, P.Grey, G.Hanneman. The Telecommunications-Transportation Tradeoff, Wiley, New York,
1976.

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). 2000. “Trading Thin Air.” White Paper. Washington,
DC. June.

Safirova, E. and K. Gillingham. 2003. “Measuring Marginal Congestion Costs of Urban Transportation: Do
Networks Matter?” RFF Discussion Paper 03-56. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2004. Final Socioeconomic Assessment for Proposed Amended
Rule 2202—On-Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options
. January. 2004.

Stavins, R. 2001. “Experience with Market-Based Instruments.” DiscussionPaper 01-58. Washington, DC:
Resources for the Future.

Swift, B., and E. Haites. 2002. “Emission Reduction Credit Trading Systems: An Overview of Recent Results and
an Assessment of Best Practices.” Research Report. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. Emissions Trading Policy Statement: General Principles for
Creating, Banking and Use of Emission Reduction Credits: Final Policy Statement and Accompanying
Technical Issues Document.
51 FR 43834. Washington, DC.

———. 1993. Interim Guidance on the Generation of Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credits. Washington,
DC.

27



More intriguing information

1. Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
2. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
3. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
4. The role of statin drugs in combating cardiovascular diseases
5. The name is absent
6. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
7. The name is absent
8. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
9. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
10. Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests
11. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
12. The name is absent
13. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
17. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
18. The name is absent
19. 5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan
20. Who runs the IFIs?