Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region



the emission market can be noticed - in the past ten years the number of visitors from distant
countries has decreased in favor of visitors from Central Europe, where the structure has also
changed in favor of tourist from transitional countries.

Railway transport participated with a symbolic amount of significantly less than 1 per
cent. The reasons for this extremely unfavorable condition lay in outdated infrastructure and
facilities that can offer only poor-quality and non-competitive transport services.

Maritime transport, despite occasional mild oscillations, does not feature a downward
trend and can be considered to be satisfactory. Nevertheless, the extremely modest share of
merely 1,3 per cent at the end of the observed period was brought about not only because of
changes on the emission market, that is, a multifold drop in the number of Italian tourists,
including boaters, but also because of the technical and technological obsoleteness of
seafaring facilities.

Safety parameters in certain transport modes in Croatia indicate some similarities
compared with ecology parameters. An analysis that has been made during 1999 with the aim
to contribute to the National strategy of safety in traffic included two main Croatian routes of
utmost importance for tourists’ flows. These were: Rijeka-Zagreb (road and railway) and
Rijeka-Dubrovnik (road and ships line).

Table 6 Traffic of Vehicles and Passengers, Traffic Accidents and Their
Consequences on the Route Rijeka-Zagreb

Road__________

_______1993

_______1994

_______1995

_______1996

Average day
traffic per year

9 050

9 399

9 750

12 527

Vehicles traffic

3 303 250

3 430 635

3 558 750

4 572 355

Passengers traffic

17 375 095

18 045 235

18 734 355

24 050 587

No. of accidents

___________1 108

___________1 185

___________1 233

___________1 244

No. of killed pass.

____________28

______________18

______________18

______________12

No. of seriously
injured pass._______

64

79

55

64

No. of injured

156

167

156

148

Railway_________

_______1993

_______1994

_______1995

_______1996

Passengers traffic

1 769 448

1 749 368

1 421 551

1 302 864

No.of accidents

_______£

_______________7_

________________6_

________________2_

No.of killed pass.

______________3_

______________3_

________£

_________£

No. of injured

________________________1

________________5

______________4

______________2

SourceiBozic m et all. Brojenje prometa na cestama RH. Prometis, Zagreb, 1994-1997
Statistics MUP RH, Odjel prometne policije, Zagreb,1998.

Note: Passengers traffic per year has been predicted according to empirical parameters
of average no. of passengers in a road vehicle.

10



More intriguing information

1. From music student to professional: the process of transition
2. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
3. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
4. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
5. The name is absent
6. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL
7. The name is absent
8. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
9. The name is absent
10. Research Design, as Independent of Methods