If we plug the γjs back into the expression for pj/k, we obtain,
_ exp(Yj) exp(β0zjk)
pj/k " PJ=1 exp(β0Zjk + Yj )
_ __________nj__exp(β0Zjt)
PK=1 exp(βzjk + Ik) PJ=1 exP(αj + βzjk)
_ exp(β0Zjk + Ik )
PtT=1 exp(β0zjk + Ik)
and the concentrated log-likelihood is that of a logit model where the choices
are now the sectors with an alternative specific constant added to the model.
This log-likelihood is equivalent to that of a Poisson regression with fixed-
effects (see, for example, Cameron & Trivedi (1998)].
24
More intriguing information
1. A multistate demographic model for firms in the province of Gelderland2. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
3. Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve
4. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California
5. The name is absent
6. The Complexity Era in Economics
7. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
8. The name is absent
9. Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital in North Bengal - A Review of Causes, Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies
10. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)