Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region



14

In the second phase an examination of the barriers to innovation took place separately in each
of the two industrial sectors. In addition, differences in each sector between the metropolitan
area and the peripheral region were also examined. Table 2 presents the results in the hi-tech
sector and Table 3 in the traditional sector.

Perhaps the most interesting and unacceptable outcome resultant from the order of importance
ascribed to the list of barriers is the high correlation between the two extremely different
industrial sectors. Both the hi-tech sector and the traditional industry ranked the same five
economic barriers as the most effective factors on innovation, albeit with a slight changes in
the inside order of these factors. The same was found with the next four supportive factors
included in the medium level of significant group.

Such results pointed to the necessity to address more general policy in order to reduce the
principal limitations, instead of adapting specific policy to each of the industrial sectors.
Accordingly, such policy must emphasize mainly on the five economic factors that basically
decrease the willingness and ability of the firms to engage in innovation.

A consistent higher mean score was found as ascribed by the hi-tech firms to the more
important barriers (factors 1-9 in the list) than by the traditional sector. The explanation to this
relies on twofold. First, the great experience that the hi-tech firms grant from their vast
engagement in innovation, in comparison to that of the traditional industry. Such experience
creates much more knowledge on the real effect of these barriers. This can be illustrated by
the percent of firms (in the sample) that engaged in product innovation that comes to 72% in
the hi-tech sector, and only 41% among firms belong to the traditional industry. Secondly, the
development of new product in the hi-tech sector involved, in general, more complicated
inputs in contrast with those that needed in the traditional industry. Thus increasing the effect
of                                            the                                            risk



More intriguing information

1. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
2. Detecting Multiple Breaks in Financial Market Volatility Dynamics
3. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design
4. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
5. The name is absent
6. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
7. Moffett and rhetoric
8. CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING AS INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM AND ASSISTANCE OF DECISION
9. Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes
10. A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions
11. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
12. Brauchen wir ein Konjunkturprogramm?: Kommentar
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
16. The name is absent
17. A novel selective 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor prevents human adipogenesis
18. The name is absent
19. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany
20. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide