Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis



ft = Dft-1 +εt                                   (2)

where D is the r × r autoregressive coefficient matrix and εt is an r × 1 vector of (reduced
form) innovations. The coefficient matrix
D and the residuals εt of the VAR(1) model in
(
??) are estimated by OLS (once the r factors ft have been retrieved in the first stage of the
analysis). Then, an
r × q matrix R is obtained using the following eigenvalue-eigenvector
decomposition of Σ (which is the sample covariance matrix for the innovations,
εt, in ??):

R=KM                           (3)

In particular, M is a diagonal matrix having the square roots of the q largest eigenval-
ues of Σ on the main diagonal;
K is an r × q matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors
corresponding to the
q largest eigenvalues of Σ. The matrix R measures the relationship be-
tween the
r dimensional vector of reduced form innovations, εt , and a q dimensional vector
of common shocks
ut (with q < r):

εt = Rut                                       (4)

From equations (??) and (??) we can observe that the matrix R measures the impact
of the common shocks
ut on each factor ft and it is crucial in retrieving the impact of the
common shocks
ut on each series of the dataset x (via equation ??).

3.2 Density forecast from the principal components model

In this section we describe how we obtain the density forecasts of the EMP index associated,
with the unobservable common shock
ut (interpreted as a regional vulnerability indicator).
Given that crisis events are related to the distribution tail of the
EM P index, the focus of the
forecasting exercise in this paper is not on average scenarios, but on the adverse realisations
of shocks either common or specific to each variable in the dataset
x. For this purpose, in
this section we show how to obtain predictions (corresponding to adverse scenarios) from the
Dynamic Factor model described. The first model we consider is the augmented Dynamic
Factor model (see Stock and Watson, 2002) which gives the following projection of the
unstandardised
EMP index of the j-th country:

EMPj,t+ι = a о + XX αk EMPit+1 -k + X βift +1 + j+1           (5)

k=1                     i=1

In this model, fft+1is the one step ahead prediction for the ith component of the r di-
mensional vector of factors, given by
Dift, where Di is the i-th row of D and ft is the last



More intriguing information

1. ‘Goodwill is not enough’
2. Pursuit of Competitive Advantages for Entrepreneurship: Development of Enterprise as a Learning Organization. International and Russian Experience
3. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
4. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
5. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
6. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
7. Alzheimer’s Disease and Herpes Simplex Encephalitis
8. The name is absent
9. Correlates of Alcoholic Blackout Experience
10. The name is absent
11. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
12. L'organisation en réseau comme forme « indéterminée »
13. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
14. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
15. The name is absent
16. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
17. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
18. Behavior-Based Early Language Development on a Humanoid Robot
19. Job quality and labour market performance
20. Tax systems and tax reforms in Europe: Rationale and open issue for more radical reforms