GENERAL UNRESTRICTED MODEL
EQUATION FOR THE SPREAD BETWEEN INTEREST RATES ON BANK OVERDRAFT AND
MONETARY POLICY RATE (INTEREST RATE ON LOANS BY THE BANK OF ITALY)
The data employed for the estimates cover the period 1990 QI - 1998 QIV
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
D.P.D. RESULTS
Instruments used are:
CONST ta_d(-2) ta_d(-3) ta_d(-4)
so_u(-4) so_u(-5) isco(-1) tdif(-1)
c3 c4 a1 a3
ta_d(-5) so_u(-1) so_u(-2) so_u(-3)
tdif(-2) tdif(-3) tdif(-4) tdif(-5)
a4 a5 a6 IND DUMS
LEVELS IV
|
Number of firms: |
54 |
Sample period is 1991 QII to 1998 QI |
|
Observations: |
1512 |
Degrees of freedom: 1487 |
|
Dependent variable |
is: |
ta_d |
ONE-STEP ESTIMATES WITH ROBUST TEST STATISTICS
|
Wald |
test |
of joint |
significance: |
505.422951 |
df = |
22 |
|
Wald |
test |
- jt sig |
of ind dums: |
0.341599 |
df = |
2 |
|
Wald |
test selected by user: |
10.299139 |
df = |
10 | ||
Testing:ta_d(-2) ta_d(-3) ta_d(-4) so_u(-2) so_u(-3) so_u(-4) isco
tdif tdif(-1) tdif(-2)
|
Var |
Coef |
Std. Error |
T-Stat |
P-Value |
|
CONST |
0.918082 |
5.373138 |
0.170865 |
0.864330 |
|
ta_d(-1) |
3.237775 |
3.886986 |
0.832978 |
0.404857 |
|
ta_d(-2) |
-0.970432 |
1.540478 |
-0.629955 |
0.528724 |
|
ta_d(-3) |
-0.157001 |
0.433125 |
-0.362485 |
0.716989 |
|
ta_d(-4) |
-0.396844 |
0.909495 |
-0.436335 |
0.662594 |
|
so_u |
5.501375 |
3.635302 |
1.513320 |
0.130198 |
|
so_u(-1) |
-3.951405 |
3.237292 |
-1.220590 |
0.222241 |
|
so_u(-2) |
-1.606319 |
3.287958 |
-0.488546 |
0.625163 |
|
so_u(-3) |
1.047737 |
2.816219 |
0.372037 |
0.709866 |
|
so_u(-4) |
-3.611479 |
3.118469 |
-1.158093 |
0.246826 |
|
isco |
0.046276 |
0.125520 |
0.368677 |
0.712369 |
|
tdif |
-2.573195 |
3.468352 |
-0.741907 |
0.458144 |
|
tdif(-1) |
0.662969 |
2.671158 |
0.248196 |
0.803983 |
|
tdif(-2) |
0.474065 |
0.452225 |
1.048293 |
0.294504 |
|
tdif(-3) |
0.283370 |
0.289738 |
0.978022 |
0.328063 |
|
tdif(-4) |
0.339537 |
0.287402 |
1.181402 |
0.237443 |
|
c3 |
-3.979281 |
2.735695 |
-1.454577 |
0.145786 |
|
c4 |
-3.158094 |
2.214824 |
-1.425889 |
0.153900 |
|
a1 |
0.022598 |
0.234861 |
0.096217 |
0.923349 |
|
a3 |
-0.057324 |
0.479939 |
-0.119441 |
0.904926 |
|
a4 |
-0.255889 |
0.967343 |
-0.264527 |
0.791374 |
|
a5 |
-0.694210 |
1.738182 |
-0.399389 |
0.689607 |
|
a6 |
-0.911166 |
1.378700 |
-0.660888 |
0.508684 |
|
I2 |
-0.140736 |
0.608300 |
-0.231359 |
0.817036 |
|
I3 |
-0.416781 |
1.109827 |
-0.375536 |
0.707262 |
|
Robust test |
for first-order |
serial correlation: -0.814 |
[ 54 ] | |
|
Robust test |
for second-order |
serial correlation: 0.620 |
[ 54 ] | |
36
More intriguing information
1. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM2. The name is absent
3. Short report "About a rare cause of primary hyperparathyroidism"
4. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
5. The name is absent
6. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
7. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
8. The name is absent
9. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS
10. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?