European Integration: Some stylised facts



represents the establishment of institutional bodies for monitoring the
development and decision making at the Union level.

EU integration has progressed in all three dimensions in the past. Increasingly
more areas have been submitted to decision making at the EU level. The
formation of the customs union and the EMU constituted significant steps
towards increased integration in functional scope as each country transferred its
national sovereignty in trade policy and monetary policy to the EU level.
Integration in space has taken place as the number of Member States has
increased from 6 in 1958 to 15 in 1995. Also institutional capacity has been
increased. Especially the adoption of the Maastricht and the Amsterdam Treaty,
have delegated more decision-making powers to the Council by limiting the
cases requiring unanimous decisions. A new powerful institution has also
appeared by the establishment of the European Central Bank.

The simultaneous integration in all three dimensions is hardly erratic but
reflects linkages in the integration process, which may also appear in future.
Integration of functional scope may lead to integration in the geographical
domain. When the Internal Market was established, countries outside the EU
got a stronger incentive to seek membership of the EU to get full access to this
market. Similarly, if the euro project develops successfully, more countries will
want to participate. A widening of the EU with more members creates a
demand for efficient decision making, which points to the need of establishing
more powerful, federal institutions instead of relying on intergovernmental co-
operation. Enlargement without securing an efficient decision making
mechanism through a strengthening of the federal institutions may bring the
integration process to a stalemate.

In a Union with many Member States, there may be opposing views on the
future course of the Union, and especially disagreement on the degree of
federalism. If the stalemate scenario should be avoided, a possibility would be
to open up for membership at different layers, where some Member States are
allowed to proceed into deeper stages of integration without committing all
members to be involved. However, allowing for such flexibility has its costs, as
it will contribute to a weakening of the EU institutions and confuse the decision
making process.

29



More intriguing information

1. L'organisation en réseau comme forme « indéterminée »
2. The name is absent
3. A novel selective 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor prevents human adipogenesis
4. ISO 9000 -- A MARKETING TOOL FOR U.S. AGRIBUSINESS
5. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
6. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
7. Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows
8. Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model
9. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
10. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
11. PER UNIT COSTS TO OWN AND OPERATE FARM MACHINERY
12. The name is absent
13. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
14. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
15. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
19. The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (El) in the Workplace.
20. Strategic Investment and Market Integration