The name is absent

WORKSHOP ON EXTENSION EVALUATION

William W. Wood, Jr.

Extension Economist, Univ. OfCalifornia, Riverside

A brief review of the congressionally mandated evaluation includ-
ing conflicts in perceptions and other relationships at the federal
level was followed by enunciation of implications for field staff
and implications for public policy education. For field staff the
principal implications relate to program planning and the develop-
ment of abilities to document program impacts. Statement of objec-
tives and explicit identification of clientele are critical components.

In the public policy education arena three items were identified
for which program consideration seems appropriate :

1. Development of a clear understanding of the difference be-
tween program analysis and political support. Both analytical
and political approaches to program evaluation are important
but do not substitute for each other.

2. Extension staff and administration appear to lack under-
standing of the policy process within the federal government.
Public policy educators have an opportunity to help improve
this level of understanding.

3. Public policy education appears to offer potential in gener-
ating support for educational programs through its framework
of analyzing and comparing alternatives.

119

1  

More intriguing information