taken place in agriculture if we compare conditions in 1964 with
those that existed at the end of World War I and the situation as we
project it for 1975. All that is required to compare today with the
past is good 20-20 hindsight. To look ahead—even for ten short
years—is a much more difficult task. The best I can do here is to look
at the past, observe the present, and project existing trends into the
next few years.
Item |
Changes in Production | ||
1919 |
1964 |
1975 | |
Number of farms |
6.5 |
3.5 |
2 + |
Number of com- |
2.0 |
1 + | |
Farm population: Millions |
31.2 |
13.3 |
10.0 |
Percent of |
29.7 |
7.7 |
5.0 |
Average size of Acres |
148 |
303 |
450 |
Capital |
$12,000 (est.)* |
$51,000 |
$75,000 |
Number of farm |
13.2 |
6.7 |
5.0 |
Farm workers |
1 for 7 |
1 for 28 |
1 for 35 |
Mechanization |
Mostly |
Electrified |
Will increase |
Managerial skills |
horse-drawn |
and highly Skilled |
More highly |
Use of records |
physical Very little |
management |
skilled and |
Specialization On farms |
Mostly general |
Most farms— |
—tax purposes, Further spe- |
farms |
one or two |
cialization— |
* $10,300 value of land and buildings.
115
More intriguing information
1. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.2. Quality Enhancement for E-Learning Courses: The Role of Student Feedback
3. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
4. Non-farm businesses local economic integration level: the case of six Portuguese small and medium-sized Markettowns• - a sector approach
5. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
6. The name is absent
7. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY
8. The name is absent
9. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
10. The name is absent