DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL



Provided by Research Papers in Economics

DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL
POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL
DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL

Richard L. Gardner

Idaho Rural Development Council

Collaboration is a much-used word these days. Why? The need for
collaboration is being driven from several directions. Policy issues
are increasingly diverse and are increasingly viewed from a systems,
or holistic, perspective. Words such as
integrated, comprehensive,
watershed,
and ecosystem are creeping into the planning lexicon.
Framing issues in such a broad way makes strategic sense, but cre-
ates confusion and conflicts among service deliverers with overlap-
ping missions, authorities, programs and service areas.

In addition, budget constraints operating at the local, state and na-
tional levels mean that no single agency can craft effective solutions
to complex problems. This creates a powerful motivation for work-
ing together. Finally, there is renewed interest in making govern-
ment more effective by being more attuned to customer needs. Cit-
izen customers are best served by involving them in decision making
early and often, another reason to forge partnerships.

What is meant by collaboration? It is not cooperation, in which au-
thorities inform others of what they plan to do anyway. Nor is it co-
ordination, in which authorities share information and alter what
they plan to do anyway to mesh with what others intend to do any-
way.
Collaboration involves committing decision-making authority
and resources to a group of stakeholders with a shared interest in tak-
ing action on an issue.
This is not easy to do. It is risky to voluntarily
relinquish control. In addition, collaborations seek to include all
stakeholders and to respect all viewpoints.

Figure 1 illustrates three planning models (U.S. Department of
Agriculture, p. 7). Note that the interactive model is the dominant
method of public involvement today. Agencies develop plans, hold
public hearings at which they inform citizens and receive their com-
ments, then formulate responses and revise their plan. Decision-
making authority is retained in the agency. In the collaborative
model, the stakeholders come together as a community of interest
and share decision making.

National Rural Development Partnership

State rural development councils (SRDCs) are a modest invest-
191



More intriguing information

1. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
2. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
3. The name is absent
4. WP 36 - Women's Preferences or Delineated Policies? The development or part-time work in the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom
5. The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach
6. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
7. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain
11. A Computational Model of Children's Semantic Memory
12. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
13. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
14. Trade and Empire, 1700-1870
15. A dynamic approach to the tendency of industries to cluster
16. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models
17. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Economies of Size for Conventional Tillage and No-till Wheat Production