The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach



urban regeneration in deprived european neighbourhoods 419
urban regeneration. But the degree of freedom of action of such agencies is
determined to a great extent not just by the local economic context, but also
the socio-cultural context, and in particular, the relative strength or weakness
of civil society. What we are witnessing at the neighbourhood level across
Europe is a greater fluidity of urban policies, and the creation of a field of
experimentation through which agencies and actors can discover what can
succeed and what fails. This trans-national learning - a rare opportunity to
share knowledge across borders - was a key element of the ENTRUST project.
As Kaspov has stated “Cites are once again laboratories of how citizenship, in
terms of membership, social inclusion and participation, is going to be
constructed in the future,” (Kaspov, 2005, p. 33).

REFERENCES

AMIN, ASH and NIGEL THRIFT, 2002. Cities: Re-imagining the Urban, Cambridge:
Polity Press.

BENINGTON, JOHN, 2001. “Partnerships as networked governance?” in M. Geddes
and J. Benington (eds.),
Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European
Union: New Forms of Local Social Governance
? London: Routledge, pp. 198-219.

BRENNER, NEIL, 2004. New State Spaces. Urban Governance and the Rescaling of
Statehood,
Oxford University Press.

BURTON, P., 2003. “Community Involvement in Neighbourhood Regeneration:
Stairway  to Heaven or Road to  Nowhere”, CNR Paper 13.

www.neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk

BYRNE, DAVID, 2001. Understanding the Urban. London: Palgrave.

CASTELLS, MANUEL, 1996. The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell.

CARLEY, M. et al., 2000. Regeneration in the Twenty-first Century, Bristol: Policy
Press.

CORCORAN, MARY P., 1998. “The Re-enchantment of Temple Bar” in E. Slater and M.
Peillon (eds.),
Encounters with Modern Ireland, Dublin: IPA, pp. 9-26.

CORCORAN, MARY P., 2002. “Place Attachment and Community Sentiment in
Marginalized Neighbourhoods: A European Case Study” in
Canadian Journal of
Urban Research
, Vol, 11, Issue 1, Summer, pp. 47-68.

ELSTER, JOHN, 1998. Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

ETZIONI, A., 1995. The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the
Communitarian Agenda,
London: Fontana.

GEDDES, MIKE and JOHN BENINGTON, 2001. “Social Exclusion and Partnership in
the European Union” in M.Geddes and J. Benington (eds.),
Local Partnerships and
Social Exclusion in the European Union. New Forms of Local Social Governance
?
London: Routledge, pp. 15-45.

GEDDES, MIKE and PATRICK Le GALES, 2001. “A Process of Regime
Restructuring?” in M. Geddes and J. Benington (eds.),
Local Partnerships and
Social Exclusion in the European Union. New Forms of Local Social Governance
?
London: Routledge, pp. 220-241.



More intriguing information

1. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. An Intertemporal Benchmark Model for Turkey’s Current Account
8. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China
9. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning
10. The name is absent
11. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
12. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
13. The Veblen-Gerschenkron Effect of FDI in Mezzogiorno and East Germany
14. The name is absent
15. Who is missing from higher education?
16. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case
17. The name is absent
18. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
19. Une Classe de Concepts
20. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE