worry about making mistakes. While some children are quite spontaneous
others think long and hard before they get involved. In a school context, many
are aware of the risk of'taking a risk' and making mistakes and, although
children generally do not seem to mind too much, they try hard to avoid making
any mistakes and the danger of being laughed at.
In both schools some children seemed embarrassed by direct questions from
the teacher and by being put on the spot. Speaking in a second language in a
natural acquisition context where one is surrounded by native-speakers of that
language cannot easily be equated with speaking in a foreign language in the
classroom, surrounded by others who share one's native language. These
findings seem to suggest that natural characteristics that might exist in natural
language acquisition environments cannot be simply be taken for granted in the
foreign language classroom.
Interestingly, a number of children said they preferred it if the teacher 'spoke' in
English although it was not established Whetherthis meant 'explained' in
English or 'spoke' in English generally. It is possible that, contrary to Krashen's
claim that use of the target language lowers the affective filter, maximum use of
the target language raises anxiety levels rather than lower these for young
children.
354
More intriguing information
1. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights2. The name is absent
3. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS
4. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
5. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
6. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
7. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
8. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
9. References
10. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES