SLA RESEARCH ON SELF-DIRECTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES



With this in mind, I would like to give a brief account of the I∕GS and the way
they linked with the ISs.

The first session, “Please, don’t pay attention”, was aimed to make the
participants aware of their attention and the way they could control it. Throughout
different activities, the participants regulated their attention according to the instructions
of the leader of the group. After these three sessions, I had the feeling that I did not get
relevant information from the learners. At that time, their answers were too vague for me
to make sense to them. However, as the reader will notice in the following section (7.2),
at the end of the project, the data as a whole was more coherent than what it appeared at
this early stage.

After the activities, they discussed their experiences and reactions. Skill-wise, I
believed that it made the learners realise the possibilities of working at a level of
metacognitive skills (although they have not been introduced to the concept).
Theoretically, it dealt with the concept of attention, which was going to be introduced in
the following IS.

After the first IS (on self-direction and learning process), we had a series of three
individual sessions which I called Awareness 1, 2 and 3 for the aim was to discuss their
awareness according to the three first elements of the learning process. The following
figure shows the connection:

1) BEING READY

2) NOTICING

3) STRUCTURING

a) Awareness 1

Awareness 2

Awareness 3

b) Intention

Attention

Awareness of understanding

c) Are you ready?

Are you focused?

Did you understand?

d)Tell me what you plan to do

Tell me what you found

Tell me what you understood

Fig. 7.6 Three Input sessions on awareness

The purpose of these sessions was to make them realise their degree of intention,
attention and awareness of understanding when learning the target language. These
sessions were supported by open questionnaires (see appendix 7) which they had to
answer before attending the session. In that way, they were not taken by surprise when
answering my main question (point d) in Fig 7.6) but already prepared to talk about it.
During the session, I also made reference to the previous IS in which I introduced the
concepts of being ready, noticing and structuring.

200



More intriguing information

1. Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks
2. The name is absent
3. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
4. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
5. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
6. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
7. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
8. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Voluntary Teaming and Effort
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
17. Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies
18. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE
19. A multistate demographic model for firms in the province of Gelderland
20. The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions as Revealed from Micro Income Tax Statistics in Germany