SLA RESEARCH ON SELF-DIRECTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES



3

8 Aug

Autonomy, independence and self-access work

4

22

How do we Ieam foreign languages at school?

5

29

What do you think of the Self-Access Centre?

6

5 Sep

The counsellor, the counselling sessions and the SAC user

7

19

Project evaluation

Fig. 7.7 The discussion sessions (DS)

There were two purposes underlying these sessions. First, I expected to get an
overall idea of the belief systems of the participants in relation to the concepts that are
related to self-direction. The data from their sessions constituted the main source to
develop the discussion of the previous chapter.

Second, I believe that open discussions enhance awareness of one’s own beliefs
and attitudes. Although I did not research this area, I think that it deserves further
attention. This is mainly because I discovered that the group discussions add
cohesiveness to a working group, which results in better activities and individual
motivation.

The results from the discussion groups have already been discussed in Chapter 6.
Here, I would like just to add a reflection about my role in them. When I had to describe
the way I worked in the group discussions, I saw my role as one of observer who was
only taking notes and whose participation was limited to elicit information from the
participants. However, when I listened to the recorded tapes, I discovered that, although
my intention was that, I did not limit myself to that role. I certainly participated in the
discussions at two different levels. At a surface level, I led the argument and I gave my
opinion. When leading the argument, I started the discussion with a opening general and
third person point of view, I invited them to participate, I posed questions to specific
people, I paraphrased and synthesised their comments, I confronted contrary views, I
summarised and gave an end to the session. Surprisingly, I realised that I also gave my
own personal opinion. At a deeper level I had a hidden agenda. I wanted them to say
certain things, I wanted them to realise other things, and I wanted them to consider my
own point of view. In section 7.3, I will specifically analyse an extract from my
participation in the discussion group sessions and the beliefs that are behind it.

As a way of a summary, Fig. 7.8 gives a synthesis of the type of sessions that
were carried in the Oaxaca /97 project and their corresponding objectives.

206



More intriguing information

1. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
2. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
3. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan
4. The name is absent
5. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
6. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
7. The name is absent
8. Alzheimer’s Disease and Herpes Simplex Encephalitis
9. The name is absent
10. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
14. Bird’s Eye View to Indonesian Mass Conflict Revisiting the Fact of Self-Organized Criticality
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
18. The name is absent
19. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
20. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics