3 |
8 Aug |
Autonomy, independence and self-access work |
4 |
22 |
How do we Ieam foreign languages at school? |
5 |
29 |
What do you think of the Self-Access Centre? |
6 |
5 Sep |
The counsellor, the counselling sessions and the SAC user |
7 |
19 |
Project evaluation |
Fig. 7.7 The discussion sessions (DS)
There were two purposes underlying these sessions. First, I expected to get an
overall idea of the belief systems of the participants in relation to the concepts that are
related to self-direction. The data from their sessions constituted the main source to
develop the discussion of the previous chapter.
Second, I believe that open discussions enhance awareness of one’s own beliefs
and attitudes. Although I did not research this area, I think that it deserves further
attention. This is mainly because I discovered that the group discussions add
cohesiveness to a working group, which results in better activities and individual
motivation.
The results from the discussion groups have already been discussed in Chapter 6.
Here, I would like just to add a reflection about my role in them. When I had to describe
the way I worked in the group discussions, I saw my role as one of observer who was
only taking notes and whose participation was limited to elicit information from the
participants. However, when I listened to the recorded tapes, I discovered that, although
my intention was that, I did not limit myself to that role. I certainly participated in the
discussions at two different levels. At a surface level, I led the argument and I gave my
opinion. When leading the argument, I started the discussion with a opening general and
third person point of view, I invited them to participate, I posed questions to specific
people, I paraphrased and synthesised their comments, I confronted contrary views, I
summarised and gave an end to the session. Surprisingly, I realised that I also gave my
own personal opinion. At a deeper level I had a hidden agenda. I wanted them to say
certain things, I wanted them to realise other things, and I wanted them to consider my
own point of view. In section 7.3, I will specifically analyse an extract from my
participation in the discussion group sessions and the beliefs that are behind it.
As a way of a summary, Fig. 7.8 gives a synthesis of the type of sessions that
were carried in the Oaxaca /97 project and their corresponding objectives.
206
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
3. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
4. Behavior-Based Early Language Development on a Humanoid Robot
5. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study
6. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
10. The name is absent