θ3
α1λ3β3γ4 + (а4λ3 - λ4α3)γ4
<λ3 - а3Xβ3 - γ3)
(4.3)
θ4
α 2λ3βY 4
(λ3 - α3)(β3 - Y3)
(4.4)
First of all we note that equation (4.2) is similar to the ones estimated in the literature
with the possible exception of the terms concerning the banks’ reserves, which are usually
not included. However the banks’ reserves would drop from equation (4.2) had we
assumed γ1 = 0 in (3.2), so that money supply would not depend directly on the amount
of reserves6.
There are some important points to note about equation (4.2). The first important
point to note is that we may have α1 = 0 in (4.3), but θ3 ≠ 0 or θ3 = 0 in (4.2) with
α1 > 0 . Thus, as recognised in the literature, the fact that the coefficient of rt in the
estimated reduced form equation is significantly negative does not imply the existence of
the lending channel. Moreover, the sign of θ3 is not unambiguously negative, as the term
(α4λ3 - λ4α3) in (4.3) may be either positive or negative.
In order to identify (the sign of) α1 we need to impose some restrictions on the
model. For instance, the coefficient θ3 will be certainly negative if (α4λ3-λ4α3)>0.
Also, it turns out that if we assume what we shall call the “spread condition” i.e., that
λ3=-λ4 in (3.3) and α3=-α4 in (4.1), θ3 reduces to
θ = αιλ3β3γ4
(4.5)
3 (λ3 - а3)(β3 - γз)
which is expected to be negative. In this case, θ3 will be zero if (and only if) а1 = 0 ,
given that by assumption we must have the other parameters in (4.5) different from zero.
Thus, under this hypothesis, if in equation (4.2) the estimated θ3 is significantly negative
we may conclude for the existence of the lending channel not only because а1 > 0, but
also because а3 cannot be very large (else the estimated θ3 will be very small). In any
case we cannot say anything about the importance of the credit channel, because we
cannot obtain an estimate for а1 . We also note that the “spread condition” cannot be
tested nor imposed during the estimation process.
6 We note however that some authors have also estimated equations with bank reserves as a regressor
(see, for instance Favero et al (1999)), but in this case, with no interest rate. According to (4.2) a general
reduced form equation should consider both the central bank interest rate and bank reserves as regressors.