Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?



Table 1 - Fiscal determination of price level and monetary policy

_________The monetary authority tries to set:_________

the nominal interest rate

a monetary aggregate

Ricardian regime,
monetary dominance

In this case the price level
is undetermined (*)

The price level is
determined, using the
quantitative relation of
money

Non-Ricardian regime,
fiscal dominance

The price level may be
determined by the
government budget
constraint (**)_____________

The price level is
overdetermined

(*) The case mentioned by Sargent and Wallace (1975).

(**) Leeper (1991), Sims (1994) and Woodford (1994,1995).

Buiter (1998, 1999, 2001), one of the critics of the FTPL, argues that the theory
proposed by the work of LSW is what he calls “the pure fiscal theory of the
initial price
level” (Buiter [1998, pp. 25]). In fact, Buiter (1998) mentions that the initial price level
is determined by equation (25) and is proportional to the stock of non-monetary
liabilities (public debt), and this could be understood strictly as what the author
mentions as the “quantity theory of nominal bonds.” However, and taking into account
the initial price level, in the following periods prices will be determined by equation
(19). Besides, the nominal stock of money has an effect on the nominal interest rate,
that is, for a given level of public debt and prices, an increase of the money stock
implies a decrease of the nominal interest rate and, with a constant real interest rate,
there should be a decrease of the future nominal value of government debt. The decline
of public debt will then lower the price level, and so Buiter maintains that money still
influences prices.

Buiter stresses also the fact that it does not seem reasonable that the government uses
the budget constraint (6) to determine the primary balance and the issuance of public
debt, without taking into account a given price level. Also, the models presented by the
proponents of the FTPL, give the impression that they are determining a level of public
debt default and not so much the price level. If the responsibles of economic policy
were to adopt the ideas of the FTPL, there would end up to appear either situations of
default on public debt reimbursements or situations of hyperinflation.

Cochrane (2000) answers back to Buiter’s criticisms by saying that Buiter is taking for
granted a Walrasian formation of prices in the market, were no transaction occurs until

13



More intriguing information

1. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
2. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
3. Conflict and Uncertainty: A Dynamic Approach
4. IMMIGRATION POLICY AND THE AGRICULTURAL LABOR MARKET: THE EFFECT ON JOB DURATION
5. The Clustering of Financial Services in London*
6. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
7. The Composition of Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
11. The name is absent
12. Towards Teaching a Robot to Count Objects
13. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
14. An institutional analysis of sasi laut in Maluku, Indonesia
15. CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING AS INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM AND ASSISTANCE OF DECISION
16. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkul des naturlichen Schlieβens nebst Metatheorie
17. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
18. The name is absent
19. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
20. The name is absent