mixing model. For this model, we can establish the joint limits of the sample
averages of panel data whose time series are non-ergodic, as we show in Section
4 and Appendix.
Suppose that (Ω, F, P) is a basic probability space, and G, H, Z are sub-
sigma fields of F with Z ⊂ G and Z ⊂ H. Then, a conditional α-mixing coeffi-
cient between two sub-sigma fields G and H on Z is defined as
αz (G, H)= sup ∣PZ (G ∩ H ) - Pz (G) Pz (H )∣, (31)
G∈G, H∈H
where PZ (∙) denotes a conditional probability defined on the sigma field Z.10
This conditional α-mixing coefficient is a straightforward extension of the usual
α-mixing coefficient, except that it uses the conditional probability Pz (∙) in-
stead of the usual unconditional probability P (∙).
The general definition of the conditional α-mixing coefficient can apply to
our panel data model as follows. Suppressing the subscript i for convenience,
assume that {xt }t and z are scalar random variables, respectively defined in the
probability space (Ω, F, P), where supt E ∣xt∣2q < ∞, for some q > 1.11 Define
F-∞ = σ (..., xt-1 ,xt);Ft+d = σ (xt+m , xt+m+1 , ...);Z = σ(z),
where Z is assumed to be a non-trivial sigma field, i.e., in Z there exists a
subset A of Ω with 0 < P (A) < 1. Define
αz (d) = sup sup ∣PZ (G ∩ H) - Pz (G) Pz (H)∣. (32)
t G∈F-t∞,H∈Ft∞+d
With this definition, we will say that the sequence {xt} is conditionally α-mixing
if and only if
αz (d) → 0 a.s. , (33)
as d →∞, where the almost sure convergence of αz (d) holds with respect to
an outer probability measure P * of the probability space (Ω, F, P ).12
A technical problem in using the conditional α-mixing coefficient αz (d) (as
well as αz (G,H)) is that it is not necessarily measurable with respect to the
conditioning sigma field Z . This problem raises some technical difficulties in
deriving useful inequalities. For example, following the usual techniques related
to (unconditional) α-mixing coefficients, one may expect that the following
conditional versions of α-mixing inequalities hold:
1
|EZ (xtxt+d)-(EZxt) (EZxt+d)∣ ≤ 2-q~⅛z (d)^—~´(≡up(Ez ∣xt∣2q ´
q-1 t
(34)
|Ez (xtxt+d)-(Ezxt)(Ezxt+d)| ≤ 8

1
EZ ∣xt∣2qj) q
(35)
10 We also could define similar conditional mixing coefficients of β- mixing and φ- mixing.
11The xt need not be strictly stationary.
12For the details of the outer probability measure P *, readers may refer to Chapter 1.2 of
van der Vaart and Wellner (1996).
17
More intriguing information
1. Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance2. Une Classe de Concepts
3. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
4. Clinical Teaching and OSCE in Pediatrics
5. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
6. Segmentación en la era de la globalización: ¿Cómo encontrar un segmento nuevo de mercado?
7. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
8. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
9. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
10. The name is absent