mixing model. For this model, we can establish the joint limits of the sample
averages of panel data whose time series are non-ergodic, as we show in Section
4 and Appendix.
Suppose that (Ω, F, P) is a basic probability space, and G, H, Z are sub-
sigma fields of F with Z ⊂ G and Z ⊂ H. Then, a conditional α-mixing coeffi-
cient between two sub-sigma fields G and H on Z is defined as
αz (G, H)= sup ∣PZ (G ∩ H ) - Pz (G) Pz (H )∣, (31)
G∈G, H∈H
where PZ (∙) denotes a conditional probability defined on the sigma field Z.10
This conditional α-mixing coefficient is a straightforward extension of the usual
α-mixing coefficient, except that it uses the conditional probability Pz (∙) in-
stead of the usual unconditional probability P (∙).
The general definition of the conditional α-mixing coefficient can apply to
our panel data model as follows. Suppressing the subscript i for convenience,
assume that {xt }t and z are scalar random variables, respectively defined in the
probability space (Ω, F, P), where supt E ∣xt∣2q < ∞, for some q > 1.11 Define
F-∞ = σ (..., xt-1 ,xt);Ft+d = σ (xt+m , xt+m+1 , ...);Z = σ(z),
where Z is assumed to be a non-trivial sigma field, i.e., in Z there exists a
subset A of Ω with 0 < P (A) < 1. Define
αz (d) = sup sup ∣PZ (G ∩ H) - Pz (G) Pz (H)∣. (32)
t G∈F-t∞,H∈Ft∞+d
With this definition, we will say that the sequence {xt} is conditionally α-mixing
if and only if
αz (d) → 0 a.s. , (33)
as d →∞, where the almost sure convergence of αz (d) holds with respect to
an outer probability measure P * of the probability space (Ω, F, P ).12
A technical problem in using the conditional α-mixing coefficient αz (d) (as
well as αz (G,H)) is that it is not necessarily measurable with respect to the
conditioning sigma field Z . This problem raises some technical difficulties in
deriving useful inequalities. For example, following the usual techniques related
to (unconditional) α-mixing coefficients, one may expect that the following
conditional versions of α-mixing inequalities hold:
1
|EZ (xtxt+d)-(EZxt) (EZxt+d)∣ ≤ 2-q~⅛z (d)^—~´(≡up(Ez ∣xt∣2q ´
q-1 t
(34)
|Ez (xtxt+d)-(Ezxt)(Ezxt+d)| ≤ 8

1
EZ ∣xt∣2qj) q
(35)
10 We also could define similar conditional mixing coefficients of β- mixing and φ- mixing.
11The xt need not be strictly stationary.
12For the details of the outer probability measure P *, readers may refer to Chapter 1.2 of
van der Vaart and Wellner (1996).
17
More intriguing information
1. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality2. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
3. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
4. The name is absent
5. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
6. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
7. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES
8. The name is absent
9. Innovation and business performance - a provisional multi-regional analysis
10. Public Debt Management in Brazil