Table 1
Joint Tests for H0a; A = ¾2 =0
0 I-L
Frequency of Rejections in 2000 Replications
Weight Matrix is ROOK
LM H |
½ = 0:0 |
LM H |
½ = 0:2 |
LM H |
½ = 0:5 | ||||||
N, |
T |
A |
GHM |
LRJj |
GHM |
LRJj |
GHM |
LRJj | |||
25, |
3 |
0.0 |
0.021 |
0.022 |
0.048 |
0.241 |
0.351 |
0.379 |
0.825 |
0.961 |
0.963 |
0.1 |
0.073 |
0.074 |
0.089 |
0.359 |
0.386 |
0.405 |
0.875 |
0.967 |
0.970 | ||
0.2 |
0.154 |
0.198 |
0.219 |
0.474 |
0.432 |
0.473 |
0.920 |
0.969 |
0.973 | ||
0.3 |
0.277 |
0.414 |
0.435 |
0.605 |
0.566 |
0.633 |
0.944 |
0.970 |
0.980 | ||
0.4 |
0.469 |
0.688 |
0.728 |
0.727 |
0.711 |
0.788 |
0.963 |
0.976 |
0.989 | ||
0.5 |
0.634 |
0.876 |
0.900 |
0.845 |
0.844 |
0.909 |
0.983 |
0.980 |
0.996 | ||
0.6 |
0.832 |
0.967 |
0.976 |
0.934 |
0.953 |
0.978 |
0.989 |
0.988 |
0.998 | ||
0.7 |
0.950 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
0.973 |
0.984 |
0.996 |
0.997 |
0.996 |
0.999 | ||
0.8 |
0.987 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
0.995 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
0.999 |
0.997 |
1.000 | ||
0.9 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
25, |
7 |
0.0 |
0.038 |
0.039 |
0.061 |
0.805 |
0.895 |
0.890 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
0.1 |
0.115 |
0.144 |
0.151 |
0.916 |
0.940 |
0.916 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.2 |
0.299 |
0.450 |
0.463 |
0.962 |
0.949 |
0.947 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.3 |
0.611 |
0.827 |
0.836 |
0.986 |
0.984 |
0.986 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.4 |
0.866 |
0.983 |
0.984 |
0.997 |
0.997 |
0.997 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.5 |
0.975 |
0.999 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.6 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
49, |
3 |
0.0 |
0.035 |
0.041 |
0.062 |
0.440 |
0.608 |
0.613 |
0.979 |
0.999 |
0.999 |
0.1 |
0.120 |
0.133 |
0.135 |
0.613 |
0.638 |
0.633 |
0.996 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.2 |
0.289 |
0.384 |
0.403 |
0.786 |
0.750 |
0.767 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.3 |
0.513 |
0.724 |
0.738 |
0.902 |
0.860 |
0.895 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.4 |
0.782 |
0.948 |
0.956 |
0.965 |
0.946 |
0.969 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.5 |
0.920 |
0.992 |
0.992 |
0.989 |
0.994 |
0.997 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.6 |
0.993 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.7 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
49, |
7 |
0.0 |
0.033 |
0.040 |
0.050 |
0.977 |
0.996 |
0.994 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
0.1 |
0.188 |
0.259 |
0.263 |
0.994 |
0.997 |
0.996 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.2 |
0.563 |
0.779 |
0.775 |
0.999 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.3 |
0.895 |
0.984 |
0.986 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.4 |
0.993 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.5 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
11
More intriguing information
1. On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms2. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
3. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
4. Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
5. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries
9. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
10. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003