Table 1
Joint Tests for H0a; A = ¾2 =0
0 I-L
Frequency of Rejections in 2000 Replications
Weight Matrix is ROOK
LM H |
½ = 0:0 |
LM H |
½ = 0:2 |
LM H |
½ = 0:5 | ||||||
N, |
T |
A |
GHM |
LRJj |
GHM |
LRJj |
GHM |
LRJj | |||
25, |
3 |
0.0 |
0.021 |
0.022 |
0.048 |
0.241 |
0.351 |
0.379 |
0.825 |
0.961 |
0.963 |
0.1 |
0.073 |
0.074 |
0.089 |
0.359 |
0.386 |
0.405 |
0.875 |
0.967 |
0.970 | ||
0.2 |
0.154 |
0.198 |
0.219 |
0.474 |
0.432 |
0.473 |
0.920 |
0.969 |
0.973 | ||
0.3 |
0.277 |
0.414 |
0.435 |
0.605 |
0.566 |
0.633 |
0.944 |
0.970 |
0.980 | ||
0.4 |
0.469 |
0.688 |
0.728 |
0.727 |
0.711 |
0.788 |
0.963 |
0.976 |
0.989 | ||
0.5 |
0.634 |
0.876 |
0.900 |
0.845 |
0.844 |
0.909 |
0.983 |
0.980 |
0.996 | ||
0.6 |
0.832 |
0.967 |
0.976 |
0.934 |
0.953 |
0.978 |
0.989 |
0.988 |
0.998 | ||
0.7 |
0.950 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
0.973 |
0.984 |
0.996 |
0.997 |
0.996 |
0.999 | ||
0.8 |
0.987 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
0.995 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
0.999 |
0.997 |
1.000 | ||
0.9 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
25, |
7 |
0.0 |
0.038 |
0.039 |
0.061 |
0.805 |
0.895 |
0.890 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
0.1 |
0.115 |
0.144 |
0.151 |
0.916 |
0.940 |
0.916 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.2 |
0.299 |
0.450 |
0.463 |
0.962 |
0.949 |
0.947 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.3 |
0.611 |
0.827 |
0.836 |
0.986 |
0.984 |
0.986 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.4 |
0.866 |
0.983 |
0.984 |
0.997 |
0.997 |
0.997 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.5 |
0.975 |
0.999 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.6 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
49, |
3 |
0.0 |
0.035 |
0.041 |
0.062 |
0.440 |
0.608 |
0.613 |
0.979 |
0.999 |
0.999 |
0.1 |
0.120 |
0.133 |
0.135 |
0.613 |
0.638 |
0.633 |
0.996 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.2 |
0.289 |
0.384 |
0.403 |
0.786 |
0.750 |
0.767 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.3 |
0.513 |
0.724 |
0.738 |
0.902 |
0.860 |
0.895 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.4 |
0.782 |
0.948 |
0.956 |
0.965 |
0.946 |
0.969 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.5 |
0.920 |
0.992 |
0.992 |
0.989 |
0.994 |
0.997 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.6 |
0.993 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.7 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
49, |
7 |
0.0 |
0.033 |
0.040 |
0.050 |
0.977 |
0.996 |
0.994 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
0.1 |
0.188 |
0.259 |
0.263 |
0.994 |
0.997 |
0.996 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.2 |
0.563 |
0.779 |
0.775 |
0.999 |
0.999 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.3 |
0.895 |
0.984 |
0.986 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.4 |
0.993 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 | ||
0.5 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
11
More intriguing information
1. Implementation of Rule Based Algorithm for Sandhi-Vicheda Of Compound Hindi Words2. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
3. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test
4. Citizenship
5. The name is absent
6. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
7. Anti Microbial Resistance Profile of E. coli isolates From Tropical Free Range Chickens
8. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
9. The name is absent
10. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?